tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Disaster Med Public Health Prep
. 2020 Dec 22;1-7.
doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.496. Online ahead of print.
Assessment of US Public School District Policies for Pandemic Preparedness and Implications for COVID-19 Response Activities
Cassandra A Kersten[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Allison T Chamberlain[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sherry Everett Jones[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Amra Uzicanin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Faruque Ahmed[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: To describe school district preparedness for school closures and other relevant strategies before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Methods: A stratified random sample of 957 public school districts from the 50 US states and the District of Columbia were surveyed between October 2015 and August 2016. The response rates for the questionnaires were as follows: Healthy and Safe School Environment, Crisis Preparedness Module (60%; N = 572), Nutrition Services (63%; N = 599), and Health Services (64%; N = 613). Data were analyzed using descriptive and regression techniques.
Results: Most school districts had procedures that would facilitate the implementation of school closures (88.7%). Fewer districts had plans for ensuring continuity of education (43.0%) or feeding students during closure (33.8%). The prevalence of continuity of education plans was lower in the Midwest than the Northeast (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.90). Presence of plans for feeding students was higher in high-poverty than low-poverty districts (aPR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99) and in large districts than small districts (aPR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.37-3.09).
Conclusions: Understanding factors associated with having comprehensive emergency plans could help decision makers to target assistance during the current COVID-19 pandemic and for future planning purposes.
Keywords: COVID-19; influenza; influenza pandemic; pandemic preparedness; school closure.
. 2020 Dec 22;1-7.
doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.496. Online ahead of print.
Assessment of US Public School District Policies for Pandemic Preparedness and Implications for COVID-19 Response Activities
Cassandra A Kersten[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Allison T Chamberlain[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sherry Everett Jones[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Amra Uzicanin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Faruque Ahmed[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33750506
- DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2020.496
Abstract
Objectives: To describe school district preparedness for school closures and other relevant strategies before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.
Methods: A stratified random sample of 957 public school districts from the 50 US states and the District of Columbia were surveyed between October 2015 and August 2016. The response rates for the questionnaires were as follows: Healthy and Safe School Environment, Crisis Preparedness Module (60%; N = 572), Nutrition Services (63%; N = 599), and Health Services (64%; N = 613). Data were analyzed using descriptive and regression techniques.
Results: Most school districts had procedures that would facilitate the implementation of school closures (88.7%). Fewer districts had plans for ensuring continuity of education (43.0%) or feeding students during closure (33.8%). The prevalence of continuity of education plans was lower in the Midwest than the Northeast (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.90). Presence of plans for feeding students was higher in high-poverty than low-poverty districts (aPR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.01-1.99) and in large districts than small districts (aPR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.37-3.09).
Conclusions: Understanding factors associated with having comprehensive emergency plans could help decision makers to target assistance during the current COVID-19 pandemic and for future planning purposes.
Keywords: COVID-19; influenza; influenza pandemic; pandemic preparedness; school closure.