• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Direct Comparison of Alere? i and cobas? Liat Influenza A and B Tests for Rapid Detection of Influenza Virus Infection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Aug 31. pii: JCM.01586-16. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Direct Comparison of Alere? i and cobas? Liat Influenza A and B Tests for Rapid Detection of Influenza Virus Infection.[/h] Nolte FS[SUP]1[/SUP], Gauld L[SUP]2[/SUP], Barrett SB[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] We compared two rapid, point-of care, nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of influenza A and B viruses (Alere? i, Alere and COBAS: ? Liat, Roche Diagnostics) with the influenza A and B virus test components of FilmArray? respiratory panel (BioFire Diagnostics) using 129 respiratory specimens collected in universal viral transport medium (80 influenza A and 16 influenza B virus positive) from both adult and pediatric patients. The sensitivities of the Alere test were 71.3% for influenza A and 93.3% for influenza B virus with specificities of 100% for both viruses. The sensitivities and specificities of the Liat test were 100% for both influenza A and B virus. The poor sensitivity of the Alere test for detection influenza A virus was likely due to a study set that included many low positive samples that were below its limit of detection.
Copyright ? 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.


PMID: 27582513 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01586-16
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom