• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Differential innate responses of chickens and ducks to low-pathogenic avian influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Avian Pathol. 2012 Dec;41(6):519-29. doi: 10.1080/03079457.2012.732691.
Differential innate responses of chickens and ducks to low-pathogenic avian influenza.
Cornelissen JB, Post J, Peeters B, Vervelde L, Rebel JM.
Source

a Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR , P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad , the Netherlands.
Abstract

Ducks and chickens are hosts of avian influenza virus, each with distinctive responses to infection. To understand these differences, we characterized the innate immune response to low-pathogenicity avian influenza virus H7N1 infection in chickens and ducks. Viral RNA was detected in the lungs of chickens from day 0.8 to 7, in ducks mainly at day 4. In both species, viral RNA was detected in the bursa and gut. Infection in chickens resulted in up-regulation of interferon (IFN)-α and IFN-β mRNA, while in the ducks IFN-γ mRNA was strongly up-regulated in the lung and bursa. In chickens and ducks, all investigated pathogen recognition receptor (PRR) mRNAs were up-regulated; however, in the chicken lung Toll-like receptor (TLR)7 and melanoma differentiation-associated protein (MDA)-5 mRNA were strongly induced. TLR3, TLR7 and MDA-5 responses correlated with IFN-α and IFN-β responses in chickens, but in ducks a correlation between IFN-α and TLR7, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I and MDA-5 was absent. We studied the responses of duck and chicken splenocytes to poly(I:C) and R848 analogues to analyse the regulation of PRRs without the interfering mechanisms of the influenza virus. This revealed IFN-α and IFN-γ responses in both species. MDA-5 was only strongly up-regulated in chicken splenocytes, in which time-related PRR responses correlated with the IFN-α and IFN-β response. This correlation was absent in duck splenocytes. In conclusion, chickens and ducks differ in induction of MDA-5, TLR7 and IFN-α mRNA after an influenza virus infection in vivo and after in vitro stimulation with TLR antagonists.

PMID:
23237364
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23237364
 
Back
Top Bottom