• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Different perspectives of immunizations during pregnancy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jan 7. doi: 10.3906/sag-1910-23. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Different perspectives of immunizations during pregnancy.[/h]
Celep G, Duyan ?amurdan A, Baran Aksakal FN, Kara OF.
[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Pregnant women and infants are at risk of severe lower respiratory tract infections induced by influenza or pertussis. The uptake of both vaccines is poor in spite of proven benefits and safety. We aimed to determine the knowledge and attitude of pregnant women and their primary healthcare providers towards immunization during pregnancy.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] This cross-sectional and interventional study was conducted in northern Turkey in 2016. It had three different groups including 786 pregnant women, 146 primary healthcare staff and 97 family practioners. Different questionnaires were filled by each group. The intervention phase of the study consisted of education of the expectant mothers about immunizations during pregnancy.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] 786 pregnant women aged between 17-44 years were enrolled to the study. Most of the participants had favourable attitude about vaccination, but only 1.1% had influenza immunization, none had Tdap immunization. None of the participants joining the intervention stage were immunized. The healthcare staff and family physicians had knowledge about vaccinations, but had abstention for administration. Post-exposure prophylaxis was also provided by referral centres.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Most of the participants either pregnant women or healthcare workers were not vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Dissemination of maternal immunization must be supported by the team work of healthcare professionals, authorities, universities, professional associations, stake holders, media and patients with current, evidence based knowledge.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Immunization; pregnancy; influenza; adult type pertussis vaccine (Tdap); post-exposure prophylaxis.

PMID: 31905497 DOI: 10.3906/sag-1910-23
 
Back
Top Bottom