• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Diagnostics (Basel) . Comparison of Lung Ultrasound versus Chest X-ray for Detection of Pulmonary Infiltrates in COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Diagnostics (Basel)


. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):373.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020373.
Comparison of Lung Ultrasound versus Chest X-ray for Detection of Pulmonary Infiltrates in COVID-19


Mar?a Mateos Gonz?lez[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Gonzalo Garc?a de Casasola S?nchez[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Francisco Javier Teigell Mu?oz[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kevin Proud[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Davide Lourdo[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Julia-Verena Sander[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Gabriel E Ortiz Jaimes[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Michael Mader[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jes?s Canora Lebrato[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Marcos I Restrepo[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Nilam J Soni[SUP] 3 4 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

Point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) is an attractive alternative to chest X-ray (CXR), but its diagnostic accuracy compared to CXR has not been well studied in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. We conducted a prospective observational study to assess the correlation between LUS and CXR findings in COVID-19 patients. Ninety-six patients with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 underwent an LUS exam and CXR upon presentation. Physicians blinded to the CXR findings performed all LUS exams. Detection of pulmonary infiltrates by CXR versus LUS was compared between patients categorized as suspected or confirmed COVID-19 based on reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Sensitivities and correlation by Kappa statistic were calculated between LUS and CXR. LUS detected pulmonary infiltrates more often than CXR in both suspected and confirmed COVID-19 subjects. The most common LUS abnormalities were discrete B-lines, confluent B-lines, and small subpleural consolidations. Most important, LUS detected unilateral or bilateral pulmonary infiltrates in 55% of subjects with a normal CXR. Substantial agreement was demonstrated between LUS and CXR for normal, unilateral or bilateral findings (? = 0.48 (95% CI 0.34 to 0.63)). In patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, LUS detected pulmonary infiltrates more often than CXR, including more than half of the patients with a normal CXR.

Keywords: SARS; X-ray; chest; diagnosis; imaging; ultrasound.
 
Back
Top Bottom