tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Diagnosis (Berl)
. 2020 Nov 26;dx-2020-0131.
doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0131. Online ahead of print.
Making sense of rapid antigen testing in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostics
Camilla Mattiuzzi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brandon M Henry[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giuseppe Lippi[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Although the most effective strategy for preventing or containing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks relies on early diagnosis, the paramount and unprecedented number of tests needed to fully achieve this target is overwhelming worldwide testing supply and capacity. Molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs is still considered the reference diagnostic approach. Nonetheless, identification of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in upper respiratory tract specimens and/or saliva by means of rapid (antigen) immunoassays is emerging as a promising screening approach. These tests have some advantages compared to molecular analysis, such as point of care availability, no need of skilled personnel and dedicated instrumentation, lower costs and short turnaround time. However, these advantages are counterbalanced by lower diagnostic sensitivity compared to molecular testing, which would only enable to identifying patients with higher SARS-CoV-2 viral load. The evidence accumulated to-date has hence persuaded us to develop a tentative algorithm, which would magnify the potential benefits of rapid antigen testing in SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics.
Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; diagnosis; immunoassay; virus.
. 2020 Nov 26;dx-2020-0131.
doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0131. Online ahead of print.
Making sense of rapid antigen testing in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostics
Camilla Mattiuzzi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brandon M Henry[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giuseppe Lippi[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33554523
- DOI: 10.1515/dx-2020-0131
Abstract
Although the most effective strategy for preventing or containing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks relies on early diagnosis, the paramount and unprecedented number of tests needed to fully achieve this target is overwhelming worldwide testing supply and capacity. Molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal swabs is still considered the reference diagnostic approach. Nonetheless, identification of SARS-CoV-2 proteins in upper respiratory tract specimens and/or saliva by means of rapid (antigen) immunoassays is emerging as a promising screening approach. These tests have some advantages compared to molecular analysis, such as point of care availability, no need of skilled personnel and dedicated instrumentation, lower costs and short turnaround time. However, these advantages are counterbalanced by lower diagnostic sensitivity compared to molecular testing, which would only enable to identifying patients with higher SARS-CoV-2 viral load. The evidence accumulated to-date has hence persuaded us to develop a tentative algorithm, which would magnify the potential benefits of rapid antigen testing in SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics.
Keywords: COVID-19; coronavirus; diagnosis; immunoassay; virus.