• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Diagn Interv Radiol CT Findings of COVID-19 in Follow-Up: Comparison Between Progression and Recovery

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Diagn Interv Radiol


. 2020 May 21.
doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.20176. Online ahead of print.
CT Findings of COVID-19 in Follow-Up: Comparison Between Progression and Recovery


Chun-Shuang Guan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lian-Gui Wei[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ru-Ming Xie[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Zhi-Bin Department Of Radiology Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing China Lv[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shuo Yan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Zi-Xin Zhang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Bu-Dong Chen[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to retrospectively analyze the imaging changes detected in the follow-up of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on thin-section computed tomography (CT).
Methods: We included 54 patients diagnosed with COVID-19. The mean interval between the initial and follow-up CT scans was 7.82?3.74 days. Patients were divided into progression and recovery groups according to their outcomes. We evaluated CT images in terms of distribution of lesions and imaging manifestations. The manifestations included ground-glass opacity (GGO), crazy-paving pattern, consolidation, irregular line, and air bronchogram sign.
Results: COVID-19 lesions showed mainly subpleural distribution, which was accompanied by bronchovascular bundle distribution in nearly 30% of the patients. The lower lobes of both lungs were the most commonly involved. In the follow-up, the progression group showed more involvement of the upper lobe of the left lung than the recovery group. GGO was the most common sign. As the disease progressed, round GGO decreased and patchy GGO increased. On follow-up CT, consolidation increased in the progression group while decreasing in the recovery group. Air bronchogram sign was more commonly observed at the initial examination (90.9%) than at follow-up (30%) in the recovery group, but there was no significant change in the progression group. Pleural effusion and lymphadenopathy were absent in the initial examination, but pleural effusion was observed in three cases after follow-up.
Conclusion: As COVID-19 progressed, round GGOs tended to evolve into patchy GGOs, consolidation increased, and pleural effusion could be occasionally observed. As COVID-19 resolved, the crazy-paving pattern and air bronchogram significantly decreased.
 
Back
Top Bottom