• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Diabetes Metab Syndr . No benefit of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Results of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials"

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Diabetes Metab Syndr


. 2020 Sep 1;14(6):1673-1680.
doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.08.033. Online ahead of print.
No benefit of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19: Results of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials"


Dr Subodh Kumar Pathak[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dr Abhijeet Ashok Salunke[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dr Praveen Thivari[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Apurva Pandey[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Dr Kunal Nandy[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Dr Harish V K Ratna[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Dr Sanjay Pandey[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Dr Jasneet Chawla[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Dr Jalil Mujawar[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Dr Anant Dhanwate[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Dr Vivek Menon[SUP] 11 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background and aims: Coronavirus pandemic is currently a global public health emergency with no definitive treatment guidelines. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature evaluating the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and its related formulations in COVID-19 patients.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, MedRxiv data and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials for published articles that reported the outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine or its compounds was done. We identified 1071 published studies and 7 studies were included in the analysis.
Results: The study population consisted of a total of 4984 patients, of which 1721 (34.5%) received hydroxychloroquine or its congeners (HCQ group) while 3091 (62.01%) received standard of care or had included antiviral medication (control group). The pooled estimate of successful treatment in the hydroxychloroquine group and the control group was 77.45% and 77.87% respectively, which indicated similar clinical outcomes in patients treated with hydroxychloroquine compared to the control group. The odds ratio of a favourable outcome with hydroxychloroquine was 1.11 (95 CI 0.72 to 1.69) (p = 0.20). The pooled risk difference of favourable outcome with hydroxychloroquine versus control group was 0.00 (95 CI -0.03 to 0.03) which was statistically not significant (p = 0.10).
Conclusions: The present evidence shows no benefit of hydroxychloroquine in patients affected by mild to moderate COVID-19 disease. However, now several trials on HCQ are ongoing and hopefully more data will be available soon. Hence, the management of COVID-19 is set to change for better in the future.

Keywords: COVID-19; Chloroquine; Hydroxychloroquine; Mortality; SARS-CoV-2 infection.
 
Back
Top Bottom