• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Development of an RNA strand-specific hybridization assay to differentiate replicating versus non-replicating influenza A virus

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Apr 3. pii: JCM.00252-20. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00252-20. [Epub ahead of print]
Development of an RNA strand-specific hybridization assay to differentiate replicating versus non-replicating influenza A virus.


Yang G[SUP]1[/SUP], Hodges EN[SUP]2[/SUP], Winter J[SUP]2[/SUP], Zanders N[SUP]2[/SUP], Shcherbik S[SUP]2[/SUP], Bousse T[SUP]2[/SUP], Murray JR[SUP]2[/SUP], Muraduzzaman AKM[SUP]3[/SUP], Rahman M[SUP]3[/SUP], Alamgir ASM[SUP]3[/SUP], Sabrina Flora M[SUP]3[/SUP], Blanton L[SUP]2[/SUP], Barnes JR[SUP]2[/SUP], Wentworth DE[SUP]2[/SUP], Davis CT[SUP]2[/SUP].

Author information




Abstract

Replication of influenza A virus (IAV) from negative-sense viral RNA (vRNA) requires the generation of positive-sense RNA (+RNA). Most molecular assays, such as conventional real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR), detect total RNA in a sample without differentiating vRNA from +RNA. These assays are not designed to distinguish IAV infection versus exposure of an individual to an environment enriched with IAVs, but wherein no viral replication occurs. We, therefore, developed a strand-specific hybridization (SSH) assay that differentiates between vRNA and +RNA and quantifies relative levels of each RNA species. The SSH assay exhibited a linearity of 7 logs with a lower limit of detection of 6.0x10[SUP]2[/SUP] copies of molecules per reaction. No signal was detected in samples with a high load of non-target template or influenza B virus, demonstrating assay specificity. IAV +RNA was detected at 2-4 hours post-inoculation of MDCK cells, whereas synthesis of cold-adapted IAV +RNA was significantly impaired at 37?C. The SSH assay was then used to test IAV rRT-PCR positive nasopharyngeal specimens collected from individuals exposed to IAV at swine exhibitions (n=7) or while working at live bird markets (n=2). The SSH assay was able to differentiate vRNA and +RNA in samples collected from infected, symptomatic individuals versus individuals who were exposed to IAV in the environment, but had no active viral replication. Data generated with this technique, especially when coupled with clinical data and assessment of seroconversion, will facilitate differentiation of actual IAV infection with replicating virus versus individuals exposed to high levels of environmental contamination, but without virus infection.
Copyright ? 2020 American Society for Microbiology.



PMID:32245834DOI:10.1128/JCM.00252-20
 
Back
Top Bottom