• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Detection of Influenza A virus in porcine oral fluid samples

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011 Mar;23(2):241-7.
Detection of Influenza A virus in porcine oral fluid samples.

Detmer SE, Patnayak DP, Jiang Y, Gramer MR, Goyal SM.

University of Minnesota, College of Veterinary Medicine, 1365 Gortner Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108. detm0002@umn.edu.
Abstract

Porcine oral fluids have been used for the detection of Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Porcine circovirus-2. The objective of the present study was to determine whether Influenza A virus (FLUAV) is present in porcine oral fluids at detectable levels and to validate a standard FLUAV molecular diagnostic test for porcine oral fluids. Pen-based oral fluid samples were collected on 3, 4, 5, and 6 days postinfection (DPI) from 4 groups of 6 pigs each that were inoculated intratracheally with A/Swine/Iowa/00239/2004 H1N1 and from 2 untreated or mock-inoculated groups of 6 pigs each that served as negative controls. Individual nasal swabs were also collected from these 36 pigs on 3 and 7 DPI. All oral fluid samples were examined for the presence of FLUAV by matrix gene real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) and virus isolation. Nasal swabs were tested initially by virus isolation followed by retest of negative samples with real-time RT-PCR. No oral fluid sample from virus-inoculated pigs was positive by virus isolation, but 15 of 16 positive (94%) oral fluids were positive by real-time RT-PCR. In contrast, virus was isolated from 32 of 48 (67%) nasal swabs collected from virus-inoculated pigs. In addition, 382 of 910 porcine oral fluids collected from pigs in the field between August 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, were positive by real-time RT-PCR. The results of the present study indicate that pen-based oral fluids provide an easy, effective, and safe collection method for the detection of FLUAV with rapid testing methods such as real-time RT-PCR.

PMID: 21398442 [PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21398442
 
Back
Top