• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cureus . Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines Among Pregnant Women in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Cureus


. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86115.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.86115. eCollection 2025 Jun. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines Among Pregnant Women in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aravind P Gandhi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Priyanka Yadav[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anuva Kapoor[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nishaant Ramasamy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mogan Kaviprawin[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kavinkumar Saravanan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anita Yadav[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Abhijit Choudhary[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Felista K Joseph[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) documented an estimated decrease in life expectancy of 1.6 years globally. Pregnant women exhibited higher infection rates and experienced prolonged illness durations, often exceeding four months. COVID-19 was also related to adverse maternal morbidity and near-miss incidents. In India, although there are studies on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among the overall population, the effectiveness in preventing infections among pregnant women is not well documented. The present meta-analysis pooled the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant women in India. The search was conducted among the major electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane (date of search: November 30, 2024). Screening, risk of bias (ROB), and data extraction of the studies were undertaken by two independent reviewers, with adjudication of conflicts by a third reviewer. We described the pooled effectiveness of vaccination on adverse events following immunization (AEFI) and fetomaternal outcomes using RStudio (Posit Software, Boston, MA). The I² statistic assessed the heterogeneity among studies. We conducted a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment to ascertain the certainty of the results. Database search yielded 215 unique articles. We included nine eligible studies for the analysis, including 5,630 pregnant women. Covishield and Covaxin were the vaccines taken by them. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for preterm labor in mothers with COVID-19 vaccination was 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49-0.79), with low certainty. The OR for low birth weight was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.06-13.71). AEFI rates were similar between the vaccinated pregnant and non-pregnant women (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.00-268.11). No studies on efficacy and effectiveness could be found. Our pooled analysis concluded that COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women in India is not associated with the increased risk of AEFIs or maternal or fetal outcomes.

Keywords: adverse events following immunization; covid-19 vaccine; fetomaternal outcomes; india; pregnancy.

 
Back
Top Bottom