• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Critical Care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 1;19(1):133. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Critical Care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study.[/h] Fowler RA[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Abdelmalik P[SUP]3[/SUP], Wood G[SUP]4[/SUP], Foster D[SUP]5[/SUP], Gibney N[SUP]6[/SUP], Bandrauk N[SUP]7[/SUP], Turgeon AF[SUP]8[/SUP], Lamontagne F[SUP]9[/SUP], Kumar A[SUP]10[/SUP], Zarychanski R[SUP]11[/SUP], Green R[SUP]12[/SUP], Bagshaw SM[SUP]13[/SUP], Stelfox HT[SUP]14[/SUP], Foster R[SUP]15[/SUP], Dodek P[SUP]16[/SUP], Shaw S[SUP]17[/SUP], Granton J[SUP]18[/SUP], Lawless B[SUP]19[/SUP], Hill A[SUP]20,[/SUP][SUP]21[/SUP], Rose L[SUP]22[/SUP], Adhikari NK[SUP]23,[/SUP][SUP]24[/SUP], Scales DC[SUP]25,[/SUP][SUP]26[/SUP], Cook DJ[SUP]27[/SUP], Marshall JC[SUP]28[/SUP], Martin C[SUP]29[/SUP], Jouvet P[SUP]30[/SUP]; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and The Canadian ICU Capacity Group.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]INTRODUCTION:[/h] Intensive Care Units (ICUs) provide life-supporting treatment; however, resources are limited, so demand may exceed supply in the event of pandemics, environmental disasters, or in the context of an aging population. We hypothesized that comprehensive national data on ICU resources would permit a better understanding of regional differences in system capacity.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] After the 2009-2010 Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group surveyed all acute care hospitals in Canada to assess ICU capacity. Using a structured survey tool administered to physicians, respiratory therapists and nurses, we determined the number of ICU beds, ventilators, and the ability to provide specialized support for respiratory failure.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] We identified 286 hospitals with 3170 ICU beds and 4982 mechanical ventilators for critically ill patients. Twenty-two hospitals had an ICU that routinely cared for children; 15 had dedicated pediatric ICUs. Per 100,000 population, there was substantial variability in provincial capacity, with a mean of 0.9 hospitals with ICUs (provincial range 0.4-2.8), 10 ICU beds capable of providing mechanical ventilation (provincial range 6-19), and 15 invasive mechanical ventilators (provincial range 10-24). There was only moderate correlation between ventilation capacity and population size (coefficient of determination (R[SUP]2[/SUP]) = 0.771).
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] ICU resources vary widely across Canadian provinces, and during times of increased demand, may result in geographic differences in the ability to care for critically ill patients. These results highlight the need to evolve inter-jurisdictional resource sharing during periods of substantial increase in demand, and provide background data for the development of appropriate critical care capacity benchmarks.


PMID: 25888116 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom