• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Crit Care Med . Renin-Angiotensin System Pathway Therapeutics Associated With Improved Outcomes in Males Hospitalized With COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care Med


. 2022 May 19.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005589. Online ahead of print.
Renin-Angiotensin System Pathway Therapeutics Associated With Improved Outcomes in Males Hospitalized With COVID-19


Genevieve L Y Rocheleau[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Terry Lee[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yassene Mohammed[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], David Goodlett[SUP] 3 5 6 [/SUP], Kevin Burns[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Matthew P Cheng[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Karen Tran[SUP] 9 [/SUP], David Sweet[SUP] 10 [/SUP], John Marshall[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Arthur S Slutsky[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Srinivas Murthy[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Joel Singer[SUP] 2 [/SUP], David M Patrick[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Bin Du[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Zhiyong Peng[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Todd C Lee[SUP] 8 [/SUP], John H Boyd[SUP] 1 16 [/SUP], Keith R Walley[SUP] 1 16 [/SUP], Francois Lamontagne[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Robert Fowler[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Brent W Winston[SUP] 19 [/SUP], Greg Haljan[SUP] 20 [/SUP], Donald C Vinh[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Alison McGeer[SUP] 21 [/SUP], David Maslove[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Santiago Perez Patrigeon[SUP] 22 [/SUP], Puneet Mann[SUP] 23 [/SUP], Kathryn Donohoe[SUP] 23 [/SUP], Geraldine Hernandez[SUP] 23 [/SUP], James A Russell[SUP] 1 16 [/SUP], for ARBs CORONA I Investigators



Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are associated with improved outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 according to sex and to report sex-related differences in renin-angiotensin system (RAS) components.
Design: Prospective observational cohort study comparing the effects of ARB or ACE inhibitors versus no ARBs or ACE inhibitors in males versus females. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 downregulates ACE-2, potentially increasing angiotensin II (a pro-inflammatory vasoconstrictor). Sex-based differences in RAS dysregulation may explain sex-based differences in responses to ARBs because the ACE2 gene is on the X chromosome. We recorded baseline characteristics, comorbidities, prehospital ARBs or ACE inhibitor treatment, use of organ support and mortality, and measured RAS components at admission and days 2, 4, 7, and 14 in a subgroup (n = 46), recorded d-dimer (n = 967), comparing males with females.
Setting: ARBs CORONA I is a multicenter Canadian observational cohort of patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19. This analysis includes patients admitted to 10 large urban hospitals across the four most populated provinces.
Patients: One-thousand six-hundred eighty-six patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 (February 2020 to March 2021) for acute COVID-19 illness were included.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Males on ARBs before admission had decreased use of ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.52; p = 0.007) and vasopressors (aOR = 0.55; p = 0.011) compared with males not on ARBs or ACE inhibitors. No significant effects were observed in females for these outcomes. The test for interaction was significant for use of ventilation (p = 0.006) and vasopressors (p = 0.044) indicating significantly different responses to ARBs according to sex. Males had significantly higher plasma ACE-1 at baseline and angiotensin II at day 7 and 14 than females.
Conclusions: ARBs use was associated with less ventilation and vasopressors in males but not females. Sex-based differences in RAS dysregulation may contribute to sex-based differences in outcomes and responses to ARBs in COVID-19.
 
Back
Top Bottom