tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care Med
. 2021 Sep 27.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005296. Online ahead of print.
Beneficial Effect of Prone Positioning During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019
Akram M Zaaqoq[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adrian G Barnett, Matthew J Griffee, Graeme MacLaren, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Silver Heinsar, Jacky Y Suen, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F Fraser, Heidi J Dalton, Giles J Peek, COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium (COVID Critical)
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: The study investigated the impact of prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure on the patient outcome.
Design: An observational study of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. We used a multistate survival model to compare the outcomes of patients treated with or without prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which incorporates the dynamic nature of prone positioning and adjusts for potential confounders.
Setting: Seventy-two international institutions participating in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Critical Care Consortium international registry.
Patients: Coronavirus disease 2019 patients who were supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the study period.
Intervention: None.
Measurements and main results: There were 232 coronavirus disease 2019 patients at 72 participating institutions who were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the study period from February 16, 2020, to October 31, 2020. Proning was used in 176 patients (76%) before initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and in 67 patients (29%) during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival to hospital discharge was 33% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prone group versus 22% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation supine group. Prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.68).
Conclusions: Our study highlights that prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with reduced mortality. Given the observational nature of the study, a randomized controlled trial of prone positioning on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is needed to confirm these findings.
. 2021 Sep 27.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005296. Online ahead of print.
Beneficial Effect of Prone Positioning During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Coronavirus Disease 2019
Akram M Zaaqoq[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adrian G Barnett, Matthew J Griffee, Graeme MacLaren, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Silver Heinsar, Jacky Y Suen, Gianluigi Li Bassi, John F Fraser, Heidi J Dalton, Giles J Peek, COVID-19 Critical Care Consortium (COVID Critical)
Affiliations
- PMID: 34582415
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005296
Abstract
Objectives: The study investigated the impact of prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for coronavirus disease 2019 acute respiratory failure on the patient outcome.
Design: An observational study of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. We used a multistate survival model to compare the outcomes of patients treated with or without prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, which incorporates the dynamic nature of prone positioning and adjusts for potential confounders.
Setting: Seventy-two international institutions participating in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Critical Care Consortium international registry.
Patients: Coronavirus disease 2019 patients who were supported by venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the study period.
Intervention: None.
Measurements and main results: There were 232 coronavirus disease 2019 patients at 72 participating institutions who were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the study period from February 16, 2020, to October 31, 2020. Proning was used in 176 patients (76%) before initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and in 67 patients (29%) during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Survival to hospital discharge was 33% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation prone group versus 22% in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation supine group. Prone positioning during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14-0.68).
Conclusions: Our study highlights that prone positioning during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support for refractory coronavirus disease 2019-related acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with reduced mortality. Given the observational nature of the study, a randomized controlled trial of prone positioning on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is needed to confirm these findings.