• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Crit Care Explor . Tocilizumab Versus Baricitinib in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia and Hypoxemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Crit Care Explor


. 2022 May 11;4(5):e0702.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000702. eCollection 2022 May.
Tocilizumab Versus Baricitinib in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia and Hypoxemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study


John Roddy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel Wells[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Katharine Schenck[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shrihari Santosh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Sadashiv Santosh[SUP] 4 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

In patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia, both tocilizumab and baricitinib have been shown to have clinical benefit compared with placebo. To date, there are few data comparing the two treatments, and their relative benefits and harms are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of tocilizumab versus baricitinib in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and hypoxemia.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Seven inpatient acute-care hospitals in Wisconsin.
Participants: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19, hypoxemia, and Pao[SUB]2[/SUB]-to-Fio[SUB]2[/SUB] ratio less than or equal to 300 mm Hg, who received either tocilizumab or baricitinib.
Interventions: Electronic chart review.
Measurements and main results: Patients were divided into tocilizumab and baricitinib cohorts based on actual medication received. The primary outcome was hospital discharge alive and free from mechanical ventilation within 60 days, assessed by logistic regression. Three hundred eighty-two patients were included: 194 in the tocilizumab cohort and 188 in the baricitinib cohort. Most baseline characteristics in the two cohorts were similar. All patients received dexamethasone. Two patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 380 patients, probability of successful discharge in the two cohorts was quantitatively similar in unadjusted, multivariate-adjusted, and propensity score-matched analyses. Hospital length of stay, rates of thromboembolic events, and rates of hospital-acquired infections were all similar in the two cohorts.
Conclusions: In patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and hypoxemia who receive dexamethasone, treatment with tocilizumab or baricitinib appears to result in similar outcomes.

Keywords: COVID-19; acute lung injury; baricitinib; coronavirus; hypoxemia; tocilizumab.
 
Back
Top Bottom