• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cow Power: The Energy & Emissions Benefits of Converting Manure to Biogas

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas

Amanda D Cuéllar et al 2008 Environ. Res. Lett. 3 034002 (8pp) doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034002
<table bgcolor="#99ccff" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td>
cv_tl.gif
</td> <td>
spacer.gif
</td> <td>
cv_tr.gif
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
</td> <td> <table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"> <tbody><tr> <td></td> <td> PDF (707 KB) | HTML | References</td> </tr> </tbody></table> </td> <td>
</td> </tr> <tr> <td>
cv_bl.gif
</td> <td>
spacer.gif
</td> <td>
cv_br.gif
</td> </tr> </tbody></table>
<nobr>Amanda D Cuéllar<sup>1</sup></nobr> and <nobr>Michael E Webber<sup>2,3,4</sup></nobr>
<sup>1</sup> Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, USA
<sup>2</sup> Center for International Energy and Environmental Policy, The University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, C2200 Austin, TX 78712, USA
<sup>3</sup> Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
<sup>4</sup> http://www.webberenergygroup.com
E-mail: webber@mail.utexas.edu

Abstract.
This report consists of a top-level aggregate analysis of the total potential for converting livestock manure into a domestic renewable fuel source (biogas) that could be used to help states meet renewable portfolio standard requirements and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In the US, livestock agriculture produces over one billion tons of manure annually on a renewable basis. Most of this manure is disposed of in lagoons or stored outdoors to decompose. Such disposal methods emit methane and nitrous oxide, two important GHGs with 21 and 310 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide, respectively. In total, GHG emissions from the agricultural sector in the US amounted to 536 million metric tons (MMT) of carbon dioxide equivalent, or 7% of the total US emissions in 2005. Of this agricultural contribution, 51 to 118 MMT of carbon dioxide equivalent resulted from livestock manure emissions alone, with trends showing this contribution increasing from 1990 to 2005. Thus, limiting GHG emissions from manure represents a valuable starting point for mitigating agricultural contributions to global climate change.

Anaerobic digestion, a process that converts manure to methane-rich biogas, can lower GHG emissions from manure significantly. Using biogas as a substitute for other fossil fuels, such as coal for electricity generation, replaces two GHG sources—manure and coal combustion—with a less carbon-intensive source, namely biogas combustion.

The biogas energy potential was calculated using values for the amount of biogas energy that can be produced per animal unit (defined as 1000 pounds of animal) per day and the number of animal units in the US. The 95 million animal units in the country could produce nearly 1 quad of renewable energy per year, amounting to approximately 1% of the US total energy consumption. Converting the biogas into electricity using standard microturbines could produce 88 ± 20 billion kWh, or 2.4 ± 0.6% of annual electricity consumption in the US. Replacing coal and manure GHG emissions with the emissions from biogas would produce a net potential GHG emissions reduction of 99 ± 59 million metric tons or 3.9 ± 2.3% of the annual GHG emissions from electricity generation in the US.

Received 19 March 2008, accepted for publication 26 June 2008
Published 24 July 2008
 
That's the way like modern cows will fart ;-))

That's the way like modern cows will fart ;-))

So pupst die moderne Kuh
Forscher wollen mit diesem Ballon die Pups-Gase untersuchen, um das umweltschädliche Methangas der Kühe zu verringern
Katrin Jäger


gfx9750954kuhpupsmbhf12sz8.jpg

Der Ballon auf dem Kuh-Rücken fängt Gase aus dem Popo auf


Nanu, tragen Kühe jetzt schon Airbags? Könnte man so sagen. In diesen Ballons wird aber Luft aufgefangen – Pupsluft.

Forscher vom argentinischen Institut für Agrartechnik in Castelar wollen damit die Winde der Wiederkäuer untersuchen. Denn Kühe sind böse Klimasünder. Wenn sie pupsen oder rülpsen, schicken sie Methan in die Atmosphäre – ein Gas, das 23-mal mehr zur Erderwärmung beiträgt als dieselbe Menge Kohlendioxid. Und da eine Kuh etwa alle 40 Sekunden ihre gefährlichen Winde fahren lässt, kommt ein Tier auf 300 bis 500 Liter Methangas pro Tag. Muh!

Nach Berechnungen der Welternährungsbehörde FAO belastet damit die Rinderzucht (weltweit gibt es etwa 1,4 Milliarden Rinder) das Klima ähnlich stark wie alle Menschen Indiens, Deutschlands und Japans zusammen.

Schon lange suchen Wissenschaftler deshalb nach Futterzusätzen, die die Methanbildung verhindern oder entscheidend verringern sollen. Denn: Je natürlicher die Tiere sich ernähren – nämlich auf einer Weide – desto größere Umweltsünder sind sie.

09.07.2008
© 2008 BZ Berlin

http://translate.google.de/translat...,geo=5107342.html#&sl=de&tl=en&hl=de&ie=UTF-8
http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&safe=off&q=castelar+methane+cows&btnG=Suche&meta=
 
Re: Cow Power: The Energy & Emissions Benefits of Converting Manure to Biogas

#1:
"renewable fuel source (biogas) that could be used to help states meet renewable portfolio standard requirements and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions"

Biogas, ok.

What would be imagin more instead of cutting (filtering) the polluters emissions ...
 
Back
Top