COVID- 19 Vaccine Dangers, Side Effects, Controversy - Closed thread, please see scientific library

[Pathfinder]

Summary and Work Group Interpretation:
Extended intervals for
mRNA COVID-19 vaccines

Sara Oliver, MD, MSPH
ACIP Meeting
February 4, 2022

...
VaST assessment – Myocarditis/pericarditis following
Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination

 VaST reviewed the most recent data from three U.S. safety monitoring systems*
, and well as data from international partners
 Reported rates of myocarditis/pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination
are higher than background; rates are highest after dose 2 in adolescent and
young adult males
 In most safety monitoring systems, myocarditis/pericarditis risk appears higher
after dose 2 Moderna than dose 2 Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination
 Data are limited on myocarditis/pericarditis risk following different dose 1-dose 2
intervals+

Summary: International data
Myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines

 Risk of myocarditis/pericarditis was higher for Moderna than Pfizer vaccine
– The highest risk was seen after the second dose among younger males
 Rates of myocarditis/pericarditis were lower with extended interval
(≥8 weeks) between first and second dose of mRNA vaccine primary series

...
Considerations regarding extended intervals between
first and second doses of mRNA vaccine (primary series)

Possible Benefits
 Safety:
– Extended interval appears to reduce the risk of myocarditis
– Lowest rates of myocarditis with interval at 8 weeks
 Effectiveness:
– Extended interval appears to increase VE for primary series
– Benefit may ‘level out’ at ≥8 weeks
 Implementation:
– Possibility that uptake for COVID-19 vaccine primary series could increase if
individuals/parents desire action to lower risk for myocarditis

Considerations regarding extended intervals between
first and second doses of mRNA vaccine (primary series)

Possible Risks
 Effectiveness:
– Longer duration of time where individual only have the benefit of a single dose of
mRNA vaccine
 Implementation:
– For aspects that require being ‘fully vaccinated’ (shorter quarantine, travel or
restaurants, etc), extending interval would extend the time before being ‘fully
vaccinated’

Work Group Interpretation
 An individual’s risk of getting COVID-19 likely increases the longer they are only
partially vaccinated with a single dose
 The risk would need to be balanced with the benefits of lowering rates of
myocarditis and optimizing the long-term vaccine effectiveness
 This balance is influenced by trajectory of pandemic and recent epidemiology of
COVID-19, and can change over time
 Early in the pandemic, the priority was for individuals to have optimum
protection from the primary series as quickly as possible
– Guidance around COVID-19 vaccines can be updated as new data become available
and the focus expands to the future of the COVID-19 vaccine program


Work Group Interpretation
 Clear communication for COVID-19 vaccines and preferred intervals is important
 May be populations where the benefits of earlier interval (3 or 4 weeks) would
outweigh possible risks of myocarditis
– Licensed intervals of 3 weeks (Pfizer-BioNTech) or 4 weeks (Moderna) continue to be
recommended, especially in circumstances where early protection is desired
 The Work Group supported a preferred interval of 8 weeks between the first and
second dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine primary series

...
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2022-02-04/12-COVID-Oliver-508.pdf
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/slides-2022-02-04.html

 

[GardenSpider]

John O'Looney is a funeral director who has become a reluctant whistleblower on the rise in deaths he is seeing in vaccinated people.
Here is his interview with Reiner Fuellmich of the Corona Investigative Committee in Germany.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5hN4eC1CkPXk/

 

[GardenSpider]

Here is another interview with funeral director John O'Looney that is more concise and also shorter. It has the same relevant data.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6VwFQDiEzxDX/

 

[GardenSpider]

From: Doctors 4 Covid Ethics. Dec 29, 2021

Notes and recommendations for conducting post-mortem examination (autopsy) of persons deceased in connection with COVID vaccination
by Prof. Dr. A. Burkhardt (leading pathologist in Europe).

https://doctors4covidethics.org/not...eceased-in-connection-with-covid-vaccination/


1. Background and introduction

Dr. Burkhardt and colleagues recently carried out a series of 17 autopsies on persons deceased within days to months of vaccination. Initially, none of these deaths had been attributed to the vaccines. Nevertheless, Dr. Burkhardt and colleagues found characteristic lesions in multiple organs which led them to conclude that in most patients the vaccines were likely the cause of death. Key observations were widespread vasculitis with microthrombi as well as intense lymphocytic infiltration of multiple organs. A summary of these findings has been published before [1]. Here, Dr. Burkhardt gives guidance for conducting autopsies in similar circumstances.

 

[GardenSpider]

On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination
Sucharit Bhakdi, MD and Arne Burkhardt, MD

https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-...r-causative-role-in-deaths-after-vaccination/

This text is a written summary of Dr. Bhakdi’s and Dr. Burkhardt’s presentations at the Doctors for COVID Ethics symposium that was live-streamed by UKColumn on December 10[SUP]th[/SUP], 2021. The two presentations can be viewed at the very beginning of the video recording of the symposium.

The authors

Dr. Bhakdi has spent his life practicing, teaching and researching medical microbiology and infectious diseases. He chaired the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at the Johannes Gutenberg Unversity of Mainz, Germany, from 1990 until his retirement in 2012. He has published over 300 research articles in the fields of immunology, bacteriology, virology and parasitology, and served from 1990 to 2012 as Editor-in-Chief of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, one of the first scientific journals of this field that was founded by Robert Koch in 1887.

Dr. Arne Burkhardt is a pathologist who has taught at the Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. He was invited for visiting professorships/study visits in Japan (Nihon University), the United States (Brookhaven National Institute), Korea, Sweden, Malaysia and Turkey. He headed the Institute of Pathology in Reutlingen for 18 years. Subsquently, he worked as an independent practicing pathologist with consulting contracts with laboratories in the US. Burkhardt has published more than 150 scientific articles in German and international scientific journals as well as contributions to handbooks in German, English and Japanese. Over many years he has audited and certified institutes of pathology in Germany.

--snip--

Histopathologic studies: findings


Histopathologic findings of a similar nature were detected in organs of 14 of the 15 deceased. Most frequently afflicted were the heart (14 of 15 cases) and the lung (13 of 15 cases). Pathologic alterations were furthermore observed in the liver (2 cases), thyroid gland (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, 2 cases), salivary glands (Sjögren`s Syndrome; 2 cases) and brain (2 cases).

A number of salient aspects dominated in all affected tissues of all cases:

1. inflammatory events in small blood vessels (endothelitis), characterized by an abundance of T-lymphocytes and sequestered, dead endothelial cells within the vessel lumen;
2. the extensive perivascular accumulation of T-lymphocytes;
3. a massive lymphocytic infiltration of surrounding non-lymphatic organs or tissue with T-lymphocytes.

Lymphocytic infiltration occasionally occurred in combination with intense lymphocytic activation and follicle formation. Where these were present, they were usually accompanied by tissue destruction.

This combination of multifocal, T-lymphocyte-dominated pathology that clearly reflects the process of immunological self-attack is without precedent. Because vaccination was the single common denominator between all cases, there can be no doubt that it was the trigger of self-destruction in these deceased individuals.

Conclusion

Histopathologic analysis show clear evidence of vaccine-induced autoimmune-like pathology in multiple organs. That myriad adverse events deriving from such auto-attack processes must be expected to very frequently occur in all individuals, particularly following booster injections, is self-evident.

Beyond any doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death. We note that both mRNA and vector-based vaccines are represented among these cases, as are all four major manufacturers.

 

[GardenSpider]

Here is Prof. Arne Burkhardt discussing the findings in a video interview with his slides.
It is second from the top.

https://doctors4covidethics.org/rep...erdisciplinary-symposium-ii-december-10-2021/

 

[GardenSpider]

This is a very strange and developing story I have been following since it first appeared on Dr. Jane Ruby's show. She recently broke the shocking story of an embalmer who along with others, discovered long, white fibrous stringy and stretchy clots of unknown composition.

These white clots have been observed in the deceased, and according the the undertaker, never prior to the vaccine rollout. They have to remove them in order to infuse the body with embalming fluid, which is how they were first discovered. He says people who have them, appear to have died suddenly. The clots are typically found in the veins though there are some arterial as well. Nothing more is known other than people who are preparing bodies for rest are finding these strange fibrous white clots in the majority of the vaccinated deceased. More data is needed.

At the present time, samples are being studied and the findings of the chemical analysis will be soon be known.
Here is a screen shot from the video which is about 25 minutes long.

At this juncture, I would like to believe this is a grand fiction. But I think it's important to listen to what people on the ground in the mortuaries are discovering alongside other whistleblowers, particularly if it is a new observation. Hopefully, it will turn out to be unrelated to the vaccines. Have a listen and decide for yourself if this is a story worth following.

The second part of the video discusses the discoveries of the nanoparticles found in the vaccines, transhumanism, and an interview with Dr. David Martin.

https://uimedianetwork.org/playing/the-bioweapon

 

[Emily]

This is bizzare and horrifying. Right before the fall, she joked that Jesus must especially love her because she's done so well with her vaccines and COVID. She had bleeding on the brain - just sickening to hear her head crack on the stage. Poor woman said she meant no criticism of people who don't get vaccines. She was just trying to reassure her audience. She said that in the entertainment industry, you can't work without vaccines.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...g-skull-video/

Comedian Heather McDonald Says She Won’t Get 4th Covid Jab After Collapsing on Stage, Fracturing Skull (VIDEO)

By Cristina Laila
Published February 14, 2022 at 7:17pm
Comedian Heather McDonald recently collapsed on stage and fractured her skull during her show in Tempe, Arizona seconds after delivering a joke about being triple vaxxed...
...
Dr. Drew said he has a friend who still can’t walk after getting the Covid booster, but encouraged people to get jabbed anyway.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmVH22pe9DU

Here's the story on Bob Saget - another tripled vaxxed entertainer. Injuries were worse. (Heather had black eyes from the skull trauma but not socket fractures. Sounds like Saget got up and fell again. At least Dr. Drew thought the risk for POTS is low 3 weeks after a shot for most people.

https://www.mercurynews.com/2022/02/14/bob-sagets-autopsy-sparks-new-questions-conspiracy-theories/

 

[GardenSpider]

Great post. I like what he says at the end.
"Why am I going to take this shot blindly? Having blind faith... Ask questions. It's your body. You only get one body, one chance at life. Don't ruin it."

 

[GardenSpider]

Here is a long interview with the embalmer Richard Hirschman with Steve Hirsch.
https://rumble.com/vurqv9-embalmer-...novel-clotting-in-65-of-vaxxed-persons-c.html

Steve Hirsch confirms this story with an independent embalmer, Cary Watkins, via a Skype call.
Here is his interview.
https://rumble.com/vuycmg-embalmer-with-50-years-of-experience-verifies-hirschmans-story.html

"Cary Watkins is an embalmer with over 50 years of experience. He knows Richard Hirschman and vouches for him. Cary has personally seen these clots himself and says they are unlike anything he's ever seen before. Hirschman suspected the vaccine many months ago, but has only recently shared his experiences on camera. This interview is important because it shows that Hirschman had been seeing this months ago, that he is credible, and that Watkins saw it too. Watkins doesn't use Zoom, so this was a Skype call."

 

[GardenSpider]

Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose
https://meridian.allenpress.com/apl...topsy-Histopathologic-Cardiac-Findings-in-Two

ABSTRACT

Context.– Myocarditis in adolescents has been diagnosed clinically following the administration of the second dose of an mRNA vaccine for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Objective.– To examine the autopsy microscopic cardiac findings in adolescent deaths that occurred shortly following administration of the second Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 dose to determine if the “myocarditis” described in these instances has the typical histopathology of myocarditis.

Design.– Clinical and autopsy investigation of two teenage boys who died shortly following administration of the second Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 dose.

Results.– The microscopic examination revealed features resembling a catecholamine-induced injury, not typical myocarditis pathology.

Conclusions.– The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.

 

[GardenSpider]

Matt Le Tissier - On the Record | Oracle Films
https://rumble.com/vtsp9u-matt-le-ti...cle-films.html

Why Aren’t We Investigating Surge in Sudden Deaths of Athletes?
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...aths-athletes/

• UK football legend and sports commentator, Matt Le Tissier, has been speaking out about the large number of athletes who have collapsed or died on the field, and has lost his job as a result.
• Le Tissier says he has never seen anything like it in the 17 years he played football — he is calling for an investigation into the events and says ignoring it is a “massive dereliction of duty” by the officials.
• Fact checkers and government officials are trying to negate or discredit information that supports the theory that mRNA injections are behind the sudden onslaught of injury and death, and they are studiously ignoring investigating the allegations.
• The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) reflects injuries to athletes in the general population, but it’s possible that the reports are nowhere near current.

 

[Pathfinder]

Translation Google



"Alarm signal"

Vaccination consequences: BKK health insurance company writes a letter to the Paul Ehrlich Institute

The health insurance company BKK has evaluated millions of insured data. The number of cases given by the Paul Ehrlich Institute for the consequences of vaccination are therefore too low.

updated
P. Debionne, 24.2.2022
updated 02/24/2022 - 00:27

A large German health insurance company has recorded figures on the side effects of Covid vaccines. The result was "a significant alarm signal". According to the BKK ProVita, the number of side effects is many times higher than those officially announced by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI). A letter to the PEI (available to the Berliner Zeitung) states: "In our opinion, there is a significant underreporting of the side effects of the vaccination". The board of directors of BKK ProVita, Andreas Schöfbeck, said to the world: "According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 visits to the doctor by our insured persons due to vaccination complications to be realistic to date."

The health insurance company had the data of millions of insured persons of the BKK group analyzed. Based on the evaluated data, Schöfbeck also comes to the conclusion that "a risk to human life cannot be ruled out". Schöfbeck has now sent a letter to Prof. Dr. Klaus Cichutek, the President of the Paul Ehrlich Institute. The letter also went to the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds, the German Medical Association, the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians, the Standing Vaccination Commission and the BKK umbrella organization. The Berliner Zeitung publishes the letter with the headline "Strong warning signal for coded vaccination side effects after Corona vaccination".

The letter in full:

"Dear Prof. Dr. Cichutek, the Paul Ehrlich Institute, announced in a press release that 244,576 suspected cases of vaccination side effects after corona vaccination were reported for the 2021 calendar year. The data available to our company give us reason to assume that there is a very significant underreporting of suspected cases of vaccination side effects after corona vaccination. I am enclosing an evaluation with my letter.

The data basis for our evaluation is the billing data of the doctors. Our sample is taken from the anonymized database of the company health insurance funds. The sample includes 10,937,716 insured persons. So far, we have the doctors’ billing data for the first half of 2021 and about half for the third quarter of 2021. Our query contains the valid ICD codes for vaccination side effects. This evaluation has shown, although we do not yet have the complete data for 2021, that based on the available figures, we are already assuming 216,695 treated cases of vaccination side effects after corona vaccination from this sample.

If these figures are extrapolated to the year as a whole and to the population in Germany, it is likely that 2.5-3 million people in Germany received medical treatment because of side effects of vaccination after the Corona vaccination. We see this as a significant alarm signal that must be taken into account when the vaccines are used further. In our opinion, the figures can be validated relatively easily and also at short notice by asking the other types of insurance (AOKen, substitute health insurance companies, etc.) to evaluate the data available to them accordingly. Extrapolated to the number of vaccinated people in Germany, this means that around 4-5 percent of the vaccinated people were in medical treatment because of vaccination side effects.

In our opinion, there is a significant underreporting of vaccination side effects. It is important to identify the causes of this in the short term. Our first assumption is that since no remuneration is paid for reporting side effects of vaccinations, the Paul Ehrlich Institute is often not reported because of the great effort involved. Doctors have reported to us that it takes about half an hour to report suspected vaccine damage. This means that 3 million suspected cases of vaccination side effects require around 1.5 million working hours for doctors. That would be almost the annual workload of 1,000 doctors. This should also be clarified in the short term.

Therefore, a copy of this letter is also sent to the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds also receives a copy of this letter with the request to obtain appropriate data analyzes from all health insurance companies. Since danger to human life cannot be ruled out, we would ask you to respond to the measures taken by February 22, 2022, 6 p.m.

Kind regards

Andreas Schöfbeck Board of Directors

https://www.berliner-zeitung.de/new...eibt-brief-an-paul-ehrlich-institut-li.213676

 

[sharon sanders]

bump this

 

[tetano]

Embarrassing ignorance or insidious intent to deceive - I don't know what prompted the board of BKK ProVita to warn of alleged alarm figures for vaccination complications. In any case, the conclusions from the data situation are complete nonsense”. With these clear words, Dr. Dirk Heinrich, the federal chairman of the Association of Resident Doctors (Virchowbund), the letter from the health insurance company BKK ProVita to the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI), which leaked to the media yesterday. In this letter, the insurance company claims to have found a “significant underreporting of the side effects of the vaccination”.

However, the BKK ProVita mixes two completely different areas: the medical diagnosis coding with ICD codes and the notification to the PEI. The ICD code U12.9, which is recommended for documentation, should be given, for example, for 'Adverse reactions to the use of COVID-19 vaccines, unspecified'. However, “undesirable” and “unspecified” encompass the full range of expected, mild and temporary consequences of vaccination, e.g. B. a slight swelling at the injection site or increased temperature due to the immune response. There can therefore be no talk of a “danger to human life”, as the cash register puts it. The ICD codes also primarily serve the purpose of billing for medical services.

If, on the other hand, there is a suspicion of side effects 'beyond the usual level', doctors are obliged to report this to the PEI. 'That's a blatant difference that the cash register here lets fall under the table. Just as you cannot simply equate the number of suspected cases with the number of confirmed side effects,' explains Dr. Heinrich. 'In addition, a whole series of ICD codes are lumped together during the 'evaluation', according to the motto: the more, the better.'

'But this undifferentiated swearing obviously fits into the brand image of the health insurance company, which advertises homeopathy and osteopathy as statutory services and calls itself the 'most veggie-friendly health insurance company'. Apparently you want to do advertising in the vaccination-critical clientele.”

The Virchowbund is the only free medical association that exclusively represents the interests of all doctors willing to practice, established and outpatient doctors of all disciplines.

https://www.virchowbund.de/pressemi...NLDfMbSgG2ow87_XR0JDAQvyceIG0c5joDh8LmK5zNapw

 

[Pathfinder]

Letters from BKK ProVita (in German language):

https://www.welt.de/bin/brief PEI_bin-237107021.pdf
https://www.welt.de/bin/Nebenwirkungen_bin-237107199.pdf

 

[Pathfinder]

Translation Google

Debate about “underreporting”

More vaccination side effects than known? Health insurance data cause discussions

FOCUS Online editor Sebastian Viehmann
Friday, 02/25/2022, 09:55

The board of directors of the health insurance company BKK ProVita sees an “alarm signal” for side effects of the Covid 19 vaccinations. The AOK does not confirm this - but criticizes the data situation. Doctors certainly see the danger that suspected cases will not be recognized or reported.

A "vaccination with almost no side effects" - this is how Federal Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach described the Covid-19 vaccine several times. The board of directors of the health insurance company BKK ProVita sees it differently after looking at his billing data: In an interview with the "Welt" Andreas Schöfbeck speaks of an alarm signal after the evaluation of millions of insured persons' data.

"The total number of side effects is therefore many times higher than those reported by the Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI)," writes the "Welt". From the beginning of 2021 to the middle of the third quarter, 216,695 BKK policyholders were treated for side effects from vaccines.

The evaluation is also available to FOCUS Online. It remains unclear how serious or harmless the side effects were - in any case, these are cases that have been medically clarified or were associated with hospitalization.

Health insurance data leave questions unanswered

A causal connection with the vaccination has not been proven - and the data does not say whether the vaccination really caused damage or whether the complications were only of short duration.

The PEI said on request that it is currently not possible to assess the data from the BKK, "because the institute has not yet had access to the original data and it also has no information on the evaluation method". Billing data should not be equated with side effects. The BKK umbrella organization stated in a statement that they distanced themselves from the data evaluation and did not want to comment on the content because the data did not come from the umbrella organization.

Virchowbund criticizes "Schwurbel-BKK" - PEI wants to link data

The Virchowbund, which represents resident doctors, criticized the "Schwurbel-BKK" with unusual sharpness and thus put Schöfbeck in the vicinity of lateral thinkers: It was either about "embarrassing ignorance or insidious intent to deceive". The conclusions from the data are "complete nonsense," said Federal Chairman Dirk Heinrich. The BKK Provita mixes two completely different areas: the medical diagnosis coding and the report to the PEI. "Apparently you want to do advertising in the vaccination-critical clientele."

However, the PEI apparently takes the warning signal seriously: In order to analyze possible side effects of vaccines even better, the official vaccination quotas are to be linked in a study with data from the health insurance companies, the institute told the dpa. It should start promptly.
...
The BKK board stands by its statement

Schöfbeck sticks to his statements and confirms to FOCUS Online that the PEI has announced a conversation with him in the coming week, in which he should present his view of things. "According to our calculations, we consider 400,000 visits to the doctor by our insured persons due to vaccination complications to be realistic to this day," said Schöfbeck of the "Welt", "extrapolated to the total population, this value would be three million."

The letter to the PEI, which is available to FOCUS Online, says literally: " Our query includes the valid ICD codes for vaccination side effects. This evaluation has shown that, although we do not yet have the complete data for 2021, we can already use the available numbers of 216,695 treated cases of side effects of vaccination after corona vaccination from this sample. If these figures are extrapolated to the year as a whole and to the population in Germany, there are probably 2.5-3 million people in Germany who are receiving medical treatment because of side effects of vaccination after corona vaccination We see that as a significant alarm signal that must be taken into account when the vaccines are used further. "

An evaluation by the BKK ProVita for 10.9 million insured persons of the BKK health insurance companies sees a comparatively high number of vaccination side effects with Covid19 vaccines
BKK ProVitaAn evaluation by the BKK ProVita for 10.9 million insured persons of the BKK health insurance companies sees a comparatively high number of vaccination side effects with Covid19 vaccines
...
It is striking that this number of 10.9 million insured persons - according to the annual report, BKK ProVita itself only has around 125,000 members, but Schöfbeck says it got its data from a common data pool of all BKK insurance companies - is only around 30,000 lower than that Total number of all side effects registered by the PEI for around 64 million vaccinated people throughout Germany. So if Schöfbeck's data are truly representative of the general population, that would suggest a significant underreporting of vaccination complications.

AOK on vaccination side effects: Limited meaningfulness of the data

But how big is the problem really? Can't say yet. FOCUS Online asked the major health insurance companies AOK, Barmer and TKK whether they saw similar alarm signals as BKK ProVita. Barmer cannot provide any data: "We have no relevant analysis," explains a spokesman.
...
The AOK answers in more detail. " We cannot assess the data basis and methodology of this evaluation, from which the BKK umbrella organization has since distanced itself. Basically, the billing data of the health insurance companies have only had a very limited meaningfulness on this topic, because the information about which of their insured persons were vaccinated when and with which vaccine is not available to the statutory health insurance companies at the moment," writes the health insurance company FOCUS Online.

The evaluation of the data is difficult anyway: " The evaluation of the billing code 'U12.9: Undesirable side effects when using Covid-19 vaccines' does not allow any valid statements for the above reasons and is methodologically questionable because the results are not in relation to the number of vaccinations carried out and can be assigned to a suitable control group. In addition, such an evaluation does not provide any information on whether the side effect is mild or severe, ”continues the AOK.

“Some serious side effects”

Occasionally, severe side effects of vaccinations occur. “ At AstraZeneca, for example, it is sinus vein thrombosis, at BionTech and Moderna it is myocarditis and pericarditis (less than 1 case per 10,000 people). Young men and male children and adolescents aged 12 to 17 years are particularly affected after the second dose ,” the AOK continues. However, this has long been known.
...

Side Effects: The Problem of Underreporting

It seems unusual that, despite the massive dimensions of the vaccination campaign, elementary data are still missing to assess the situation. This refers less to the vaccination reactions experienced almost millions of times, such as fever , tiredness or skin reactions, which quickly subside and are harmless . Above all, it refers to the significant side effects that require medical treatment and, in the worst case, cause consequential damage. Only these cases were considered in his data analysis at all, says BKK Board Schöfbeck FOCUS Online.
...
Not every vaccination reaction is a real side effect

FOCUS Online had already interviewed several doctors who carry out vaccinations on the subject of child vaccination in the summer of 2021 . Some report that the number of side effects observed in adults is quite significant compared to other vaccines. But there is another point they made: are all side effects recognized and reported as such?

Because, similar to Covid-19 diseases, it is not about dramatic individual cases, but whether the scope of side effects in relation to all of those vaccinated (or the Covid diseases in relation to all of those infected) is correctly assessed.

The German Society for Child and Adolescent Medicine said to FOCUS Online in the summer: " All registration systems for vaccination complications are not based on epidemiological (i.e. population-related) studies, but only on individual observations that are reported to the registration bodies such as the Paul-Ehrlich institute in Germany. An exact estimate of the frequency of vaccination complications is therefore hardly possible. There is a risk of so-called underreporting, which means that complications are systematically underestimated.”

Great responsibility of doctors

The problem: the PEI registers the reported side effect reports, but can of course only send out an alarm signal if the number of reported cases - for example the number of heart muscle inflammations or pulmonary artery embolisms in a certain age group - is significantly lower than the number of statistically expected cases deviates. The greater the underreporting or underreporting, the greater the risk that the alarm bell will not ring in the first place.
...
On the other hand, reporting suspected cases too carelessly could falsify the positive effect of the vaccination. This lies in a significant reduction in the severity of the disease when someone falls ill with Covid-19. The older the person, the clearer the risk-benefit ratio is in favor of vaccination.

Doctors could therefore jeopardize the success of the vaccination campaign if they frequently sound the false alarm and then do not vaccinate people who are at high risk of Covid.

Doctors report an increase in suspected cases

Several clinic doctors and resident doctors have reported to FOCUS Online in recent weeks about an increase in suspected cases that they have reported to the PEI. Two examples:

The senior physician of a clinic in North Rhine-Westphalia systematically records the vaccination status of his patients and reports eight pulmonary artery embolisms in temporal connection with the vaccination or the booster. "It was boosted four times with Moderna," said the doctor. He fears that many doctors do not even recognize a possible connection: even at the "upper decision-making level" the topic "has not yet arrived".
A neurologist from northern Germany who works in a stroke unit (a special ambulance for neurological emergencies) reports a "massive increase" in emergency admissions. It mainly affects middle-aged to younger women who have severe mental disorders or severe headaches after the vaccinationcomplained. The suspicion of sinus vein thrombosis has only been confirmed in a few cases - a vaccination complication that has been known since 2021, but is extremely rare. Only one death is known to him. "But these people are still ill and in need of treatment," said the doctor. Also striking: “We have had three cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome since the start of the vaccination campaign. Normally, I see something like this at most once a year,” the neurologist reported. The syndrome is a severe neurological disease caused by overshooting of the immune system, for which, according to the German Society for Neurology, a causal connection with the vaccination is not certain, but is suspected.
According to several doctors, it is more difficult to assess neurological emergencies in older patients, such as strokes occurring in connection with the vaccination. Since these clinical pictures occur more frequently in old and previously ill people, one should not assume a connection with the vaccination in case of doubt.

"Message form is too complex"

The physicians interviewed by FOCUS Online say unanimously that they consider the reporting scheme for side effects to be too complex. In view of the high number of vaccinations, a "low-threshold reporting system" is desirable. Doctors and nurses often simply do not have the time to document suspected cases in detail in everyday life, which is already characterized by bureaucracy.

In its statement, the AOK also admits that the whole topic is ultimately being discussed on the basis of insufficient data: " Even if the health insurance companies had the information about vaccinations carried out, one could only use this to determine the frequency of serious side effects (sinus vein thrombosis, myocarditis, pericarditis) in the Assess comparison to appropriate control groups. Because only with these severe side effects can it be expected that they will also be documented in a differentiated manner in the billing data ”. After all: This merging of data should now exist according to the PEI.

https://www.focus.de/gesundheit/mehr..._58570561.html

 

[GardenSpider]

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

-snip-

BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle (LNP)–encapsulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine (modRNA) and encodes the full-length of SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein, modified by two proline mutations to ensure antigenically optimal pre-fusion conformation, which mimics the intact virus to elicit virus-neutralizing antibodies [3]. Consistent with randomized clinical trials, BNT162b2 showed high efficiency in a wide range of COVID-19-related outcomes in a real-world setting [5]. Nevertheless, many challenges remain, including monitoring for long-term safety and efficacy of the vaccine. This warrants further evaluation and investigations. The safety profile of BNT162b2 is currently only available from short-term clinical studies. Less common adverse effects of BNT162b2 have been reported, including pericarditis, arrhythmia, deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, intracranial hemorrhage, and thrombocytopenia [4,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. There are also studies that report adverse effects observed in other types of vaccines [21,22,23,24]. To better understand mechanisms underlying vaccine-related adverse effects, clinical investigations as well as cellular and molecular analyses are needed.

A recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells [25]. This gives rise to the question of if this may also occur with BNT162b2, which encodes partial SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In pharmacokinetics data provided by Pfizer to European Medicines Agency (EMA), BNT162b2 biodistribution was studied in mice and rats by intra-muscular injection with radiolabeled LNP and luciferase modRNA. Radioactivity was detected in most tissues from the first time point (0.25 h), and results showed that the injection site and the liver were the major sites of distribution, with maximum concentrations observed at 8–48 h post-dose [26]. Furthermore, in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection, reversible hepatic effects were observed, including enlarged liver, vacuolation, increased gamma glutamyl transferase (γGT) levels, and increased levels of aspartate transaminase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) [26]. Transient hepatic effects induced by LNP delivery systems have been reported previously [27,28,29,30], nevertheless, it has also been shown that the empty LNP without modRNA alone does not introduce any significant liver injury [27]. Therefore, in this study, we aim to examine the effect of BNT162b2 on a human liver cell line in vitro and investigate if BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed into DNA through endogenous mechanisms.

-snip-

4. Discussion

In this study we present evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 is able to enter the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA as fast as 6 h after BNT162b2 exposure. A possible mechanism for reverse transcription is through endogenous reverse transcriptase LINE-1, and the nucleus protein distribution of LINE-1 is elevated by BNT162b2.

-snip-

5. Conclusions

Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.

 

[sharon sanders]

bump this

 

[GardenSpider]

I posted this story on this thread when it first broke and was published in the BJM. Now, a district court judge has unsealed the complaint along with all of the exhibits.

The second link posted here has 140 pages of documents and exhibits embedded that expose Pfizer's fraud.
It is really quite unnerving to realize what Pfizer knew regarding vaccine dangers and side effects and to what lengths they went to cover it up.

"The decision by a district court judge to unseal a complaint filed more than a year ago against multiple parties involved in Pfizer’s COVID vaccine trials allowed the lawsuit to go forward — and revealed 400 pages of exhibits used to substantiate the lawsuit’s claims.

A whistleblower lawsuit alleging fraud during Pfizer’s COVID vaccine trials is moving forward, after a district court judge unsealed the complaint, including 400 pages of exhibits.

Brook Jackson in January 2021 sued Pfizer and two companies the drugmaker contracted with to work on the trials: Ventavia Research Group and ICON PLC.

Jackson worked for Ventavia for a brief period in 2020 before being fired after she filed a complaint with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over alleged improprieties she observed during the vaccine trials.

She also gave The BMJ a cache of internal company documents, photos and recordings highlighting alleged wrongdoing by Ventavia."


March 1, 2022
Judge Unseals 400 Pages of Evidence, Clears Way for Pfizer Whistleblower Lawsuit
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...c-f5b50cb8275d

Pfizer Trial Whistleblower Presses Forward With Lawsuit Without US Government’s Help
https://yournews.com/2022/02/15/2299...s-governments/
The full sets of documents are embedded; the article continues below them.

Dec. 2, 2021
Pfizer Whistleblower Exposes Vaccine Data Cover-Up
https://tapnewswire.com/2021/12/pfiz...data-cover-up/

Brook Jackson Interview - Pfizer Whistleblower Exposes Cover Up Calling Vaccine Data Into Question
https://odysee.com/@TLAVagabond:5/Br...view-12-2-21:e