Use of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Myocarditis Among Vaccine Recipients: Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, June 2021 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7027e2.htm
Summary
What is already known about this topic?
An elevated risk for myocarditis among mRNA COVID-19 vaccinees has been observed, particularly in males aged 12–29 years.
What is added by this report?
On June 23, 2021, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices concluded that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination to individual persons and at the population level clearly outweighed the risks of myocarditis after vaccination.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in all recommended age groups will prevent morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 that far exceed the number of cases of myocarditis expected. Information regarding the risk for myocarditis with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines should be disseminated to providers to share with vaccine recipients.
I don't understand how the CDC doctors who convened a couple of weeks ago (not one of the voting members was a cardiologist), could recommend a product that could provoke myocarditis in children. I don't understand how the CDC could recommend a 2nd shot after heart swelling was observed after the first dose. One thing we know about the heart muscle is that the fibers don't regenerate like they do in the kidney or the liver. This means the long term effects can't be predicted. In effect, they are taking healthy kids and making them sick. How is that okay?
See: Preliminary myocarditis/pericarditis reports to VAERS following dose 2mRNA vaccination, Exp. vs. Obs. using risk window (data thru Jun 11, 2021)
https://www.idsociety.org/globalasse...all-slides.pdf
The graph clearly indicates the vaccine is dangerous to children and adolescents, particularly males. It could be argued that in the case of children, the risks to their health far outweigh the benefits of getting the vaccine. Especially when the risk of death to children and teens is so low. Wouldn't it be better for them to have natural immunity? And if they get sick, to follow the protocols laid out by the FLCCC doctors?