• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cost-effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Hong Kong - A decision analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015 Feb 25:0. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Cost-effectiveness of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Hong Kong - A decision analysis.[/h] You JH[SUP]1[/SUP], Ming WK, Chan PK.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Objectives: Trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) selects one of the two co-circulating influenza B lineages whereas quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) includes both lineages. We examined potential cost-effectiveness of QIV versus TIV from perspectives of healthcare provider and society of Hong Kong. Methods: A decision tree was designed to simulate the outcomes of QIV versus TIV in six age groups: 0-4 years, 5-9 years, 10-14 years, 15-64 years, 65-79 years and ≥80 years. Direct cost alone, direct and indirect costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) loss due to TIV-unmatched influenza B infection were simulated for each study arm. Outcome measure was incremental cost per QALY (ICER). Results: In base-case analysis, QIV was more effective than TIV in all-age population with additional direct cost per QALY (ICER-direct cost) and additional total cost per QALY (ICER-total cost) of USD22,603 and USD12,558, respectively. Age-stratified analysis showed that QIV was cost-effective in age groups 6 months to 9 years and ≥80 years from provider's perspective, and it was cost-effective in all age group except 15-64 years from societal perspective. Percentage of TIV-unmatched influenza B in circulation and additional vaccine cost of QIV were key influential factors. From perspectives of healthcare provider and society, QIV was the preferred option in 52.77% and 66.94% of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations, respectively. Conclusions: QIV appears to be cost-effective in Hong Kong population, except for age group 15-64 years, from societal perspective. From healthcare provider's perspective, QIV seems to be cost-effective in very young (6 months-9 years) and older (≥80 years) age groups.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Hong Kong; Victoria lineage; Yamagata lineage; cost-effectiveness analysis; influenza B; quadrivalent influenza vaccine; trivalent influenza vaccine

PMID: 25714506 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom