• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadrivalent versus Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Taiwan: A Lifetime Multi-Cohort Model

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Sep 13:0. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Quadrivalent versus Trivalent Influenza Vaccine in Taiwan: A Lifetime Multi-Cohort Model.[/h] Yang MC[SUP]1[/SUP], Tan EC[SUP]1[/SUP], Su JJ[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] A government-funded trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) program to prevent seasonal influenza was implemented in Taiwan since 1998. However, mismatch between the vaccine and circulating strains may occur. Alternatively, a quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV) includes all four influenza lineages could minimize the risk of mismatches. Therefore, QIV could be considered as an alternative strategy to enhance protection against seasonal influenza. The objective of the study was to analyze, from a governmental perspective, the cost-effectiveness of using QIV versus TIV as a vaccination strategy in Taiwan. A lifetime multi-cohort, static Markov model was constructed with nine age groups to assess the costs and effectiveness of QIV versus TIV. Direct costs were obtained from a database released by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Outcomes included life-years gained, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, influenza cases avoided and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The discount rate of costs and effectiveness was set at 3.5% and the time horizon used in the model was 100 years. Results show that a vaccination strategy utilizing QIV instead of TIV would bring an additional 10,557 QALYs at an extra cost of US$39.4 million, yielding an ICER of US$3,015.07 per QALY gained. When setting the willingness-to-pay threshold at US$10,000, compared to TIV, the probability that QIV would be cost-effective was 98%. Sensitivity analyses show that ICER was sensitive to the changes of circulation of influenza virus subtypes and vaccine mismatch. From a governmental perspective, the QIV vaccination could be considered as a cost-effective strategy within the context of public health in Taiwan.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Influenza vaccine; Quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIV); Quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs); Taiwan; Trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV); cost-effectiveness

PMID: 27624648 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1225636
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom