• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine In Spain

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 May 16:0. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine In Spain.[/h] Garc?a A[SUP]1[/SUP], Ortiz de Lejarazu R[SUP]2[/SUP], Reina J[SUP]3[/SUP], Callejo D[SUP]4[/SUP], Cuervo J[SUP]4[/SUP], Morano R[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Influenza has a major impact on healthcare systems and society, but can be prevented using vaccination. The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends that influenza vaccines should include at least two virus A and one virus B lineage (trivalent vaccine; TIV). A new quadrivalent vaccine (QIV), which includes an additional B virus strain, received regulatory approval and is now recommended by several countries. The present study estimates the cost-effectiveness of replacing TIVs with QIV for risk groups and elderly population in Spain. A static, lifetime, multi-cohort Markov model with a one-year cycle time was adapted to assess the costs and health outcomes associated with a switch from TIV to QIV. The model followed a cohort vaccinated each year according to health authority recommendations, for the duration of their lives. National epidemiological data allowed the determination of whether the B strain included in TIVs matched the circulating one. Societal perspective was considered, costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Compared to TIVs, QIV reduced more influenza cases and influenza-related complications and deaths during periods of B-mismatch strains in the TIV. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 8,748 ?/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). One-way sensitivity analysis showed mismatch with the B lineage included in the TIV was the main driver for ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis show ICER below 30,000?/QALY in 96% of simulations. Replacing TIVs with QIV in Spain could improve influenza prevention by avoiding B virus mismatch and provide a cost-effective healthcare intervention.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Cost-effectiveness analysis; Costs and cost analysis; Healthcare costs; Human; Influenza; Influenza B virus; Influenza vaccines; QIV; Vaccines

PMID: 27184622 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom