• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Consequences of suboptimal priming are apparent for low-avidity T-cell responses

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Immunol Cell Biol. 2011 May 10. [Epub ahead of print]
Consequences of suboptimal priming are apparent for low-avidity T-cell responses.
Venturi V, Davenport MP, Swan NG, Doherty PC, Kedzierska K.
Source

Computational Biology Group, Centre for Vascular Research, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract

The emergence of the novel reassortant A(H1N1)-2009 influenza virus highlighted the threat to the global population posed by an influenza pandemic. Pre-existing CD8(+) T-cell immunity targeting conserved epitopes provides immune protection against newly emerging strains of influenza virus, when minimal antibody immunity exists. However, the occurrence of mutations within T-cell antigenic peptides that enable the virus to evade T-cell recognition constitutes a substantial issue for virus control and vaccine design. Recent evidence suggests that it might be feasible to elicit CD8(+) T-cell memory pools to common virus mutants by pre-emptive vaccination. However, there is a need for a greater understanding of CD8(+) T-cell immunity towards commonly emerging mutants. The present analysis focuses on novel and immunodominant, although of low pMHC-I avidity, CD8(+) T-cell responses directed at the mutant influenza D(b)NP(366) epitope, D(b)NPM6A, following different routes of infection. We used a C57BL/6J model of influenza to dissect the effectiveness of the natural intranasal (i.n.) versus intraperitoneal (i.p.) priming for generating functional CD8(+) T cells towards the D(b)NPM6A epitope. In contrast to comparable CD8(+) T-cell responses directed at the wild-type epitopes, D(b)NP(366) and D(b)PA(224), we found that the priming route greatly affected the numbers, cytokine profiles and TCR repertoire of the responding CD8(+) T cells directed at the D(b)NPM6A viral mutant. As the magnitude, polyfunctionality, and T-cell repertoire diversity are potential determinants of the protective efficacy of CD8(+) T-cell responses, our data have implications for the development of vaccines to combat virus mutants.Immunology and Cell Biology advance online publication, 10 May 2011; doi:10.1038/icb.2011.36.

PMID:
21556018
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21556018
 
Back
Top Bottom