• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59?-adjuvanted with a non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly subjects

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2014 Jul 18. pii: S0264-410X(14)00939-6. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.013. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of an MF59?-adjuvanted with a non-adjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccine in elderly subjects.
Frey SE1, Reyes MR2, Reynales H3, Bermal NN4, Nicolay U4, Narasimhan V4, Forleo-Neto E4, Arora AK5.
Author information
Abstract
AIM:

Adjuvanted influenza vaccines can overcome the poor antibody response of conventional non-adjuvanted vaccines in the elderly. We evaluated the immunogenicity, safety and clinical effectiveness of an MF59?-adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) compared with a non-adjuvanted vaccine (TIV) in subjects ≥65 years old, with or without co-morbidities.
METHODS:

In 2010-2011, subjects (N=7082) were randomized to receive one dose of aTIV or TIV. Co-primary objectives were to assess lot-to-lot consistency of aTIV, non-inferiority, superiority and immunogenicity 22 days after vaccination. Clinical effectiveness, reactogenicity and serious adverse events were monitored up to Day 366.
RESULTS:

The immunological equivalence of three lots of aTIV was demonstrated. aTIV was not only non-inferior to TIV but also elicited significantly higher antibody responses at Day 22 than TIV against all homologous and heterologous strains, even in subjects with co-morbidities. Superiority was not established. Reactogenicity was higher in the aTIV group, but reactions were mild to moderate and transient.
CONCLUSIONS:

aTIV elicited a significantly higher antibody response than TIV, especially against A/H3N2 strains, although superiority by pre-defined criteria was not formally met. The study demonstrates potential immunological benefits of MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccines for the elderly. This trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01162122).

Copyright ? 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
KEYWORDS:

Adjuvant; Elderly; Influenza vaccine; MF59; Non-inferiority; Superiority

PMID:
25045825
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25045825
 
Back
Top Bottom