tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013 Sep;68(9):1206-9. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(09)05.
Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients.
Perosa AH, Watanabe AS, Guatura SB, Silva ER, Granato C, Bellei N.
Source
Clinical Virology Laboratory, Infections Disease Unit, Medicine Department, Federal University of S?o Paulo, S?o PauloSP, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of two methods for the detection of influenza virus in immunocompromised transplant patients.
METHODS:
A total of 475 respiratory samples, 236 from patients in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program and 239 from kidney transplant patients, were analyzed by a direct fluorescence assay and the Centers for Disease Control real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for influenza A and B detection.
RESULTS:
Influenza detection using either method was 7.6% in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant group and 30.5% in the kidney transplant patient group. Influenza detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction yielded a higher positive rate compared with fluorescence than that reported by other studies, and this difference was more pronounced for influenza A. The fluorescence assay sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa coefficient were 17.6%, 100%, 1, 0.83, and 0.256, respectively, and lower detection rates occurred in the kidney transplant patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
The real-time polymerase chain reaction performance and the associated turnaround time for a large number of samples support the choice of this method for use in different routine diagnostic settings and influenza surveillance in high-risk patients.
PMID:
24141835
[PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141835
Comparison of the direct fluorescence assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of influenza virus A and B in immunocompromised patients.
Perosa AH, Watanabe AS, Guatura SB, Silva ER, Granato C, Bellei N.
Source
Clinical Virology Laboratory, Infections Disease Unit, Medicine Department, Federal University of S?o Paulo, S?o PauloSP, Brazil.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of two methods for the detection of influenza virus in immunocompromised transplant patients.
METHODS:
A total of 475 respiratory samples, 236 from patients in a hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program and 239 from kidney transplant patients, were analyzed by a direct fluorescence assay and the Centers for Disease Control real-time polymerase chain reaction protocol for influenza A and B detection.
RESULTS:
Influenza detection using either method was 7.6% in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant group and 30.5% in the kidney transplant patient group. Influenza detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction yielded a higher positive rate compared with fluorescence than that reported by other studies, and this difference was more pronounced for influenza A. The fluorescence assay sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and kappa coefficient were 17.6%, 100%, 1, 0.83, and 0.256, respectively, and lower detection rates occurred in the kidney transplant patients.
CONCLUSIONS:
The real-time polymerase chain reaction performance and the associated turnaround time for a large number of samples support the choice of this method for use in different routine diagnostic settings and influenza surveillance in high-risk patients.
PMID:
24141835
[PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24141835