• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of Respiratory Specimen Collection Methods for Detection of Influenza Virus Infection by RT-PCR: A Literature Review

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jun 19. pii: JCM.00027-19. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00027-19. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Comparison of Respiratory Specimen Collection Methods for Detection of Influenza Virus Infection by RT-PCR: A Literature Review.[/h] Spencer S[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Thompson MG[SUP]3[/SUP], Flannery B[SUP]3[/SUP], Fry A[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Detection of influenza virus in respiratory specimens from ill individuals is the most commonly used method to identify influenza virus infection. A number of respiratory specimen types may be used, including swabs, brush, aspirate and wash, and specimens may be collected from numerous sites, including anterior and posterior nasopharynx, oropharynx and nares. Traditionally, respiratory specimens from the nasopharynx were considered to have highest sensitivity for viral detection. However, as molecular assays such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) have increased the sensitivity of viral detection from respiratory specimens, the use of less invasive and easier to obtain specimens has increased for the detection of influenza. This review presents and evaluates the sensitivities of respiratory specimen methods used in epidemiologic studies that used RT-PCR to detect influenza virus in respiratory specimens from ill patients. This literature review suggested that a combination of two less invasive swabbing methods, such as nasal and oropharyngeal swabs, had about the same sensitivity as nasopharyngeal specimens for influenza detection by RT-PCR. By combining two less invasive collection methods, it may be possible to reduce barriers to enrollment without compromising influenza detection sensitivity.
Copyright ? 2019 American Society for Microbiology.


PMID: 31217267 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00027-19
 
Back
Top Bottom