• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of Monkeypox virus genomes from the 2017 Nigeria outbreak and the 2022 outbreak - SFAM

Mary Wilson

Well-known member
Society for Applied Microbiology

September 08 2022

DOI: 10.1111/jam.15806

Trudy M Wassenaar[SUP] 1[/SUP], Visanu Wanchai[SUP] 2[/SUP], David W Ussery[SUP] 2[/SUP]

Abstract

Aims: The current Monkeypox virus outbreak is not only the largest known outbreak to date caused by a strain belonging of the West-African clade, but also results in remarkably different clinical and epidemiological features compared to previous outbreaks of this virus. Here, we consider the possibility that mutations in the viral genome may be responsible for its changed characteristics.

Methods and results: Six genome sequences of isolates from the current outbreak were compared to five genomes of isolates from the 2017 outbreak in Nigeria and to two historic genomes, all belonging to the West-African clade. We report differences that are consistently present in the 2022 isolates but not in the others. Although some variation in repeat units was observed, only two were consistently found in the 2022 genomes only, and these were located in intergenic regions. A total of 55 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were consistently present in the 2022 isolates compared to the 2017 isolates. Of these, 25 caused an amino acid substitution in a predicted protein.

Conclusions: The nature of the substitution and the annotation of the affected protein identified potential candidates that might affect the virulence of the virus. These included the viral DNA helicase and transcription factors.

Significance: This bioinformatic analysis provides guidance for wet-lab research to identify changed properties of the monkeypox virus.

https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jam.15806
 
Back
Top