• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparison of influenza A virus infection in high- and low-birth-weight pigs using morphometric analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 Dec;7 Suppl 4:2-9. doi: 10.1111/irv.12199.
Comparison of influenza A virus infection in high- and low-birth-weight pigs using morphometric analysis.
Detmer SE, Gunvaldsen RE, Harding JC.
Source

Department of Veterinary Pathology, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Epigenetic studies have shown that low-birth-weight (LBW) and growth restriction has been associated with reduced immune function in humans and reduced passive immunity in pigs. To examine the immune responses of high-birth-weight (HBW) and LBW groups of pigs, influenza A virus infection was used as an exemplifier of neonatal respiratory disease.
OBJECTIVES:

The objectives of this study were (i) to compare clinical, immunological, and pathological outcome of influenza infection in HBW to LBW pigs and (ii) to establish standardized sampling sites, score each site independently with set criteria, and compare scores between sites.
METHODS:

Sixty-eight 4-week-old pigs originating from either HBW or LBW litters were intratracheally inoculated with 10(6?3) TCID50 /ml of A/swine/Texas/4199-2/1998 H3N2 and euthanized 48 hours later. Samples were collected 2?5 cm from the tip of both cranial and middle lung lobes. The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections were scored in a blinded manner by a single pathologist using established scoring criteria for routine and immunohistochemical stains. Clinical parameters, lung and nasal swab virus titers, and cytokine levels for interferon-alpha and interleukin-1-beta, IL-6, and IL-8 were measured.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS:

Lung lesion severity and influenza staining intensity were significantly lower in LBW compared with HBW pigs (P < 0?05). Additionally, examining just the LBW group, the significant difference between lobes (P = 0?009) showed that the mean score for the right cranial lung lobe was higher compared with the other three lobes.

? 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
KEYWORDS:

Birth weight, epigenetic programming, influenza A virus, morphometry, swine

PMID:
24224813
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24224813
 
Back
Top Bottom