• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparative immune response and pathogenicity of the H9N2 avian influenza virus after administration of Immulant?, based on Echinacea and Nigella sati

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Aug;65:165-175. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 21.
[h=1]Comparative immune response and pathogenicity of the H9N2 avian influenza virus after administration of Immulant[SUP]?[/SUP], based on Echinacea and Nigella sativa, in stressed chickens.[/h] Eladl AH[SUP]1[/SUP], Arafat N[SUP]2[/SUP], El-Shafei RA[SUP]3[/SUP], Farag VM[SUP]4[/SUP], Saleh RM[SUP]5[/SUP], Awadin WF[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Avian influenza vaccines are commonly used in the poultry industry, and some medicinal plants can increase the efficacy of such vaccines. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Immulant[SUP]?[/SUP] (IMU) (a commercial product based on Echinacea and Nigella sativa) on stress induced by dexamethasone (DEX) in chickens vaccinated (VAC) against the H9N2 avian influenza virus (AIV-H9N2). Seven experimental groups were included: the negative control, VAC, DEX, VAC + DEX, VAC + DEX + IMU, VAC + IMU and IMU groups. The vaccinated chickens (at 10 days of age) were injected daily with DEX for three days pre-vaccination and for three days pre-challenge and orally administered 1% IMU for 6 weeks post-vaccination (PV). The chickens were then challenged intranasally with AIV-H9N2 at 28 days PV. Serum, blood, tracheal and cloacal swabs and tissue samples were collected in the 1[SUP]st[/SUP] and 4[SUP]th[/SUP] weeks PV and at different time points post-challenge. The results showed significant changes (P ≤ 0.05) in oxidative stress and antioxidant biomarkers (malondialdehyde, nitric oxide and reduced glutathione), haematological and immunological parameters, final live weights, relative organ weights and histopathological lesions between the VAC+DEX group and the VAC group. Moreover, IMU significantly increased protection rates post-challenge, HI antibody titers and heterophil phagocytic activity and decreased DEX-induced stress and virus shedding titers. In conclusion, oral administration of 1% IMU for six weeks can enhance the immune response after AI-H9N2 vaccination and reduce the pathogenicity of infection in stressed chickens.
Copyright ? 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] AIV-H9N2; Chickens; Dexamethasone; Immulant(?); Stress; Vaccine

PMID: 31300109 DOI: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.05.017
 
Back
Top Bottom