• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparative evaluation of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with and without H1N1 infection at a tertiary care referral center

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;55(1):47-51.
Comparative evaluation of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with and without H1N1 infection at a tertiary care referral center.

Samra T, Pawar M, Yadav A.

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Connaught Place, New Delhi, India.
Abstract

H1N1 subtype of influenza A virus has clinical presentation ranging from mild flu like illness to severe lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of our study was to compare the demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and mortality of critically ill patients with (H1N1+) and without H1N1 infection (H1N1-). We retrospectively analyzed medical charts of patients admitted in "Swine Flu ICU" with ARDS from August 2009 to May 2010. Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay was used for detection of H1N1 virus in the respiratory specimens. Clinical data from 106 (H1N1, 45; H1N1+, 61) patients was collected and compared. Mean delay in presentation to our hospital was 5.7 ? 3.1 days and co-morbidities were present in two-fifth of the total admissions. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of patients with and without H1N1 infection was comparable; 7.8 ? 3.5 and 6.6 ? 3.1 on day 1 and 7.2 ? 4.5 and 6.5 ? 3.1 on day 3, respectively. H1N1+ patients were relatively younger in age (34.2 ? 12.9 years vs. 42.8 ? 18.1, P = 0.005) but presented with significantly lower PaO(2):FiO(2) ratio (87.3 ? 48.7 vs. 114 ? 51.7) in comparison to those who subsequently tested as H1N1. The total leucocyte counts were significantly lower in H1N1+ patients during the first four days of illness but incidence of renal failure (P = 0.02) was higher in H1N1+ patients. The mortality in both the groups was high (H1N1+, 77%; H1N1, 68%) but comparable. There was a mean delay of 5.7 ? 3.1 days in initiation of antivirals. Patients with H1N1 infection were relatively younger in age and with a significantly higher incidence of refractory hypoxia and acute renal failure. Mortality from ARDS reported in our study in both the groups was high but comparable.

PMID: 21431053 [PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21431053
 
Back
Top Bottom