• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Comparative analysis of antibody induction and protection against influenza virus infection by DNA immunization with HA, HAe, and HA1 in mice

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Arch Virol. 2013 Oct 17. [Epub ahead of print]
Comparative analysis of antibody induction and protection against influenza virus infection by DNA immunization with HA, HAe, and HA1 in mice.
Chen J, Liu Q, Chen Q, Xiong C, Yao Y, Wang H, Wang H, Chen Z.
Source

Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei, China, chenjj126@126.com.
Abstract

Plasmid DNA vaccines are considered alternatives to inactivated influenza virus vaccines to control influenza. Vaccination with a hemagglutinin (HA)-, HA ectodomain (HAe)-, or HA subunit 1 (HA1)-based vaccine can stimulate protective immunity in animals. The aim of this study was to compare their capacity to induce an antibody response and protection against influenza virus infection in mice after DNA vaccination. We constructed three expression vectors encoding full-length HA, HAe, or HA1 of the A/California/07/2009 influenza A virus and designed three animal experiments: (i) BALB/c mice were immunized twice with 30 μg of the HA, HAe, or HA1 DNA vaccine with high-voltage electroporation (100 V), and 3 weeks after boosting, they were challenged with a lethal dose of virus. (ii) Immunization and challenge were as in experiment i, but with low-voltage electroporation (10 V). (iii) Mice were immunized once with 50 μg of DNA and challenged 1 week later. The immunogenic effects of the three DNA vaccines were evaluated in terms of antibody titer, survival rate, bodyweight change, and lung viral titer. In all three experiments, both HA and HAe induced higher antibody and neutralization titers than HA1. Following challenge with a lethal mouse-adapted homologous virus, both HA and HAe reduced the viral titers in lung washes or offered better protection from weight loss than HA1 in experiments ii and iii. Thus, HA1 induces a lower immune response than HA or HAe when used as a DNA vaccination. Our data should be valuable in choosing the optimal candidate vaccine when faced with the threat of pandemic influenza.

PMID:
24132721
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24132721
 
Back
Top Bottom