• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Combining estimates from two surveys: An example from monitoring 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Stat Med. 2012 Aug 1. doi: 10.1002/sim.5333. [Epub ahead of print]
Combining estimates from two surveys: An example from monitoring 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic vaccination.
Furlow-Parmley C, Singleton JA, Bardenheier B, Bryan L.
Source

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), Atlanta, GA, USA. cfurlow@cdc.gov.
Abstract

During the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, there was an ongoing need to monitor 2009 H1N1 vaccination coverage at the national and state level to evaluate the vaccination campaign; thus, precise vaccination coverage estimates were needed in a timely fashion. The current objective is to describe and evaluate the methodology used to combine 2009 H1N1 vaccination coverage estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the National 2009 H1N1 Flu Survey (NHFS). H1N1 state level vaccination coverage estimates were combined by taking weighted averages of the BRFSS and NHFS estimates, with more weight given to the estimate with the larger effective sample size (sample size/design effect). The impact of the choice of weights was evaluated by comparing estimates when the design effect was removed from the weights. Combined vaccination coverage estimates for children generally fell midway between NHFS and BRFSS estimates because of larger NHFS sample sizes but smaller BRFSS design effects. Adult estimates were more closely weighted to BRFSS estimates because of larger BRFSS sample sizes. Combined standard errors were smaller than the survey-specific standard errors. When removing the design effect from the weights, the child combined estimates were more closely weighted to those from NHFS, resulting in larger standard errors. Adult combined estimates were similar regardless of choice of weight because of similar design effects across the two surveys. Combining estimates by weighting by the effective sample size allowed timely release of more precise estimates in all states during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. Copyright ? 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Copyright ? 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PMID:
22859268
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22859268
 
Back
Top Bottom