• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Codas . Neurobiological activity of the auditory pathway and memory: a comparative study in individuals infected with SARS-Cov-2

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Codas


. 2026 Mar 27;38(2):e20250056.
doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/e20250056pt. eCollection 2026.
Neurobiological activity of the auditory pathway and memory: a comparative study in individuals infected with SARS-Cov-2

[Article in Portuguese, English]
Liliane Razador Kerkhoff[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hélinton Goulart Moreira[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Larissa Coradini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fabiana Cristina Toillier[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cristiane Laís Piccoloto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Denis Altieri de Oliveira Moraes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michele Vargas Garcia[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

in English, Portuguese
Purpose: To analyze the influence of SARS-CoV-2 on memory and on the components of the Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential.
Methods: Quantitative descriptive study, approved by the Research Ethics Committee under the number 56038322100005346. For the sample composition, 32 participants were invited, aged between 18 and 35 years, without hearing loss, middle ear integrity and contralateral acoustic reflexes present bilaterally, were invited to compose the sample. In addition, they were free from neurological or psychiatric alterations, with or without a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. Thirty-two individuals participated in the study, 24 (75%) females and eight (25%) males, distributed in two groups. The Study Group (EG) consisted of 15 subjects (53%) diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 and the Control Group (CG) consisted of 17 subjects (47%) without such diagnosis. All participants underwent anamnesis, meatoscopy, basic audiological evaluation, Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potential (LLAEP) and the Brief Neuropsychological Assessment Instrument-NEUPSILIN, using the total score for each memory subtype. Finally, for statistical analysis of the data, the Student's T-test was used, adopting a p-value <0.05.
Results: It was possible to observe significant differences with lower performance for the study group in Episodic-Semantic Visual Memory (p-value = 0.014) and for Short-Term Visual Memory (p-value = 0.042). In the LLAEP there was a significant difference only for the P1 component, with lower latency in the EG.
Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection negatively influenced the memory of young adults, mainly in episodic-semantic verbal memory and short-term visual memory. Furthermore, the LLAEP contributed to the diagnosis of these participants by demonstrating the deleterious effects of the infection.


 
Back
Top