• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CO2 Levels Behind and in Front of Different Protective Mask Types

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
Akhondi, Hossein; Kaveh, Sassan; Kaufman, Kimball; Danai, Tina; and Ayutyanont, Napatkamon (2022) "CO2 Levels Behind and in Front of Different Protective Mask Types," HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine: Vol. 3: Iss. 4, Article 3.
DOI: 10.36518/2689-0216.1321
Available at: https://scholarlycommons.hcahealthcare.com/hcahealthcarejournal/vol3/iss4/3

Abstract

Objectives
Many individuals have difficulty adapting to face mask use and report symptoms while using masks. Our primary objective was to determine whether continuous mask-wearing causes elevated levels of carbon dioxide (CO[SUB]2[/SUB]) behind the facemasks.
Methods
CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentrations were measured behind 3 different types of face masks and were compared to CO[SUB][SUP]2[/SUP][/SUB] concentrations at the mask front in 261 subjects who continuously wore masks for at least 5 minutes. These CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentrations were also measured in several randomly selected subjects after a 5-minute walk.
Results
There were significantly higher CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentrations behind the mask (3176 ppm) compared to the front (843 ppm) with an average of 49 minutes of continuous mask use. Of all the subjects, 76.6% had a behind-the-mask CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentration of more than 2000 ppm (the threshold for clinical symptoms), and 12.2% had a CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentration of at least 5000 ppm (occupational health exposure limit). The CO[SUB]2[/SUB] level behind the N-95 masks was highest (especially after exertion) and was lowest behind cloth masks. The combination of warm ambient temperature, an N-95 mask, exercise, and young age appeared to induce exceedingly high CO[SUB]2[/SUB] levels that should be avoided.
Discussion
Although masks might be necessary for healthcare workers or to lessen the spread of airborne disease, we found that elevated CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentrations were present while wearing them. Elevated CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentrations have historically caused symptoms of CO[SUB]2[/SUB] toxicity. Periodic mask breaks in designated areas may be needed to avoid adverse effects.
Conclusion
The use of masks increased the CO[SUB]2[/SUB] concentration in the air behind them to levels historically associated with toxicity.
 
Back
Top