• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clostridium difficile found in retail chicken

Gert van der Hoek

In Memoriam - Editor, Senior Moderator
Aug 31, 2011

Sampling turns up C diff in grocery store chicken


A study of Clostridium difficile in retail chicken found the pathogen in 3% to 12.5% of samples, depending on the cultivation procedure used, according to a study by US Department of Agriculture and Texas A&M researchers in Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. In July 2010 they cultivated 32 meat samples from packages they collected from five grocery stores in Bryan and College Station, Tex.

Testing included in-house store brands and nationally known brands. After culturing the samples they used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to characterize toxin genes, and they tested each C diff isolate they found for susceptibility to 11 antimicrobial agents.

They used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to compare the genotypes of different isolates. Seven of the 32 meat samples tested positive, and the percent of positive cultures varied by cultivation procedure, ranging from 3.2% (1) to 12.5% (4). Analysis of the isolates identified toxinotype V and PFGE type NAP7 or a NAP7 variant.

The authors wrote that they believe their report is the first to document toxinotype V and PFGE NAP7 in poultry meat. Microbial testing suggested that the C diff isolates from poultry meat showed somewhat reduced resistance than for other meat or animal toxinotype V isolates.

Aug 30 Foodborne Pathog Dis abstract

From CIDRAP
 
Back
Top