• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clinical Efficacy of Peramivir in Adult Patients with Seasonal Influenza during the winter of 2012 in Japan

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Respir J. 2014 Mar 10. doi: 10.1111/crj.12129. [Epub ahead of print]
Clinical Efficacy of Peramivir in Adult Patients with Seasonal Influenza during the winter of 2012 in Japan.
Yoshino Y1, Seo K, Koga I, Kitazawa T, Ota Y.
Author information
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Peramivir is an intravenously administered neuraminidase inhibitor for influenza. The clinical efficacy of peramivir remains unclear, because it is used in a limited number of countries. We compared the clinical efficacy of peramivir with that of oseltamivir in influenza patients during the 2012-2013 season.
METHODS:

Thirty-two influenza patients who were hospitalized at Teikyo University Hospital, a teaching hospital in Tokyo, Japan, from October 2012 to March 2013 were enrolled. Among them, 23 and 9 were treated with peramivir and oseltamivir, respectively. The endpoints of this study were the time to defervescence and survival rate.
RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in the clinical backgrounds of the 2 groups. However, patients treated with peramivir tended to have a higher incidence of consciousness disturbance [34.8% (8/23) vs. 0.00% (0/9), p = 0.06]. There were no significant differences between the peramivir and oseltamivir groups with respect to the time to defervescence (30.9 ? 18.7 hours vs. 34.7 ? 18.6 hours) or survival rate [95.7% (22/23) vs. 100% (9/9), respectively].
CONCLUSIONS:

The clinical efficacy of peramivir is noninferior to that of oseltamivir, although peramivir tended to be used in patients with serious complications. Intravenous administration of peramivir may be useful for patients with serious complications such as consciousness disturbances.

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
KEYWORDS:

Clinical efficacy, Influenza, Oseltamivir, Peramivir

PMID:
24612842
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]


http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24612842
 
Back
Top Bottom