• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Neurophysiol . Seizure control during the COVID-19 pandemic: Correlating Responsive Neurostimulation System data with patient reports

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Neurophysiol


. 2022 May 11;139:106-113.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.05.003. Online ahead of print.
Seizure control during the COVID-19 pandemic: Correlating Responsive Neurostimulation System data with patient reports


Cemal Karakas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ryan Ward[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mohamed Hegazy[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Henry Skrehot[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Zulfi Haneef[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To understand the impact of the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on seizure frequency in persons with epilepsy with a Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) system implanted.
Methods: Weekly long episode counts (LEC) were used as a proxy for seizures for six months pre-COVID-19 and during the COVID-19 period. Telephone surveys and chart reviews were conducted to assess patient mental health during the pandemic. The change in LEC between the two time periods was correlated to reported stressors.
Results: Twenty patients were included. Comparing the pre-COVID-19 period to the COVID-19 period, we found that only 5 (25%) patients had increased seizures, which was positively correlated with change in anti-seizure medications (ASM, p = 0.03) and bitemporal seizures (p = 0.03). Increased seizures were not correlated to anxiety (p = 1.00), depression (p = 0.58), and sleep disturbances (p = 1.00). The correlation between RNS-detected and patient-reported seizures was poor (p = 0.32).
Conclusions: Most of our patients did not have an increase in seizures following the COVID-19 pandemic. Changes in ASM and bitemporal seizures were positively correlated to increased LEC. There was no correlation between pandemic-related stress and seizures in those found to have increased seizures.
Significance: This is the first study correlating RNS-derived objective LECs with patient self-reports and potential seizure risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: COVID-19; Epilepsy; Long episode; Pandemic; RNS; Stressor.
 
Back
Top Bottom