• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Microbiol Infect . Comparative safety analysis of mRNA and adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines: a nationwide cohort study using an emulated tar

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Microbiol Infect


. 2023 Dec 13:S1198-743X(23)00600-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.010. Online ahead of print. Comparative safety analysis of mRNA and adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines: a nationwide cohort study using an emulated target trial approach

Min Joo Choi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yewon Na[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Hak Jun Hyun[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Eliel Nham[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jin Gu Yoon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hye Seong[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yu Bin Seo[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Won Suk Choi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Joon Young Song[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Dong Wook Kim[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Young-Eun Kim[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Jaehun Jung[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Hee Jin Cheong[SUP] 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: This nationwide cohort study compared the incidence of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) between adenoviral vector- (ChAdOx1) and mRNA-based (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines.
Methods: A targeted trial emulation study was conducted using data from the National Health Insurance Service database. Vaccinees aged 18-85 years who had received at least one dose of ChAdOx1 or an mRNA-based vaccine were identified. The 42-day risks of AESIs were calculated.
Results: A total of 1,767,539 ChAdOx1 vaccinees were matched exactly with mRNA vaccinees according to their risk factors. The 42-day risks of adverse events were low (approximately 0 to 176 events per 100,000 persons in both vaccine groups), and the incidence rates of AESIs were comparable between the two platforms, except for a higher occurrence of acute cardiac injury (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.35), myocarditis/pericarditis (IRR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.14-4.04), and arrhythmia (IRR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.71) in mRNA vaccinees. The incidence of Guillain-Barré syndrome (IRR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.06-0.69), vasovagal syncope (IRR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.97), radiculopathy (IRR= 0.59, 91% CI 0.41-0.84), and aseptic arthritis (IRR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93) was significantly lower in mRNA-based vaccinees compared to ChAdOx1 vaccinees.
Conclusions: A remarkable platform-dependent difference was observed in the safety profiles of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly for myocarditis/pericarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Nevertheless, the overall risk of AESIs was low for both vaccine platforms.


 
Back
Top Bottom