tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Microbiol Infect
. 2021 Mar 8;S1198-743X(21)00113-0.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.029. Online ahead of print.
A real-life setting evaluation of the effect of remdesivir on viral load in COVID-19 patients admitted to a large tertiary center in Israel
Elad Goldberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haim Ben Zvi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Liron Sheena[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Summer Sofer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ilan Krause[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ella H Sklan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Amir Shlomai[SUP] 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: The effectiveness of remdesivir, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been repeatedly questioned during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most of the recently reported studies were randomized controlled multicenter clinical trials. Our goal was to test the efficiency of remdesivir in reducing nasopharyngeal viral load and hospitalization length in a real-life setting in admitted patients in a large tertiary center in Israel.
Methods: A total of 142 COVID-19 patients found to have at least three reported SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR tests during hospitalization were selected for this study. Of these, 29 patients received remdesivir, while the remaining non-treated 113 patients served as controls.
Results: Among the tested parameters, the control and remdesivir groups differed significantly only in the intubation rates. Remdesivir treatment did not significantly affect nasopharyngeal viral load, as determined by comparing the differences between the first and last cycle threshold values of the SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR tests performed during hospitalization (Ct 7.07?6.85 vs. 7.08?7.27, p=0.977 in the control and treated groups, respectively). Remdesivir treatment shortened hospitalization length by less than a day compared to non-treated controls and by 3.1 days when non-intubated patients from both groups were compared. These differences, however, were not statistically significant, possibly because of the small size of the remdesivir group.
Conclusions: Remdesivir was not associated with nasopharyngeal viral load changes, but our study had a significant disease severity baseline imbalance and was not powered to detect viral load or clinical differences.
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Hospitalization length; Remdesivir; SARS-CoV-2; Viral load.
. 2021 Mar 8;S1198-743X(21)00113-0.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.029. Online ahead of print.
A real-life setting evaluation of the effect of remdesivir on viral load in COVID-19 patients admitted to a large tertiary center in Israel
Elad Goldberg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haim Ben Zvi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Liron Sheena[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Summer Sofer[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ilan Krause[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ella H Sklan[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Amir Shlomai[SUP] 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33705849
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.029
Abstract
Objectives: The effectiveness of remdesivir, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drug for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been repeatedly questioned during the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most of the recently reported studies were randomized controlled multicenter clinical trials. Our goal was to test the efficiency of remdesivir in reducing nasopharyngeal viral load and hospitalization length in a real-life setting in admitted patients in a large tertiary center in Israel.
Methods: A total of 142 COVID-19 patients found to have at least three reported SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR tests during hospitalization were selected for this study. Of these, 29 patients received remdesivir, while the remaining non-treated 113 patients served as controls.
Results: Among the tested parameters, the control and remdesivir groups differed significantly only in the intubation rates. Remdesivir treatment did not significantly affect nasopharyngeal viral load, as determined by comparing the differences between the first and last cycle threshold values of the SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR tests performed during hospitalization (Ct 7.07?6.85 vs. 7.08?7.27, p=0.977 in the control and treated groups, respectively). Remdesivir treatment shortened hospitalization length by less than a day compared to non-treated controls and by 3.1 days when non-intubated patients from both groups were compared. These differences, however, were not statistically significant, possibly because of the small size of the remdesivir group.
Conclusions: Remdesivir was not associated with nasopharyngeal viral load changes, but our study had a significant disease severity baseline imbalance and was not powered to detect viral load or clinical differences.
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Hospitalization length; Remdesivir; SARS-CoV-2; Viral load.