• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Lab . The Relationship between Serological Testing, Demographics, Clinical Presentation and RT-PCR Testing for COVID-19

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Lab


. 2021 May 1;67(5).
doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2021.210138.
The Relationship between Serological Testing, Demographics, Clinical Presentation and RT-PCR Testing for COVID-19

Bradley Gelbart, Elise Schapkaitz, Steve Kaftel, Eric Peretz, Asi Peretz

Abstract

Background: Serological tests provide an important tool to diagnose previous exposure to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Herein we describe the relationship between the demographics, clinical characteristics, and molecular investigations and the presence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antibodies.
Methods: Three hundred and four participants, living in Gauteng, South Africa, were screened for COVID-19 antibodies between September 12, and December 12, 2020. Indications for serological testing included previous infection (n = 45, 14.80%), World Health Organization (WHO) symptoms (n = 122, 40.13%), positive household contact (n = 40, 13.16%), and/or positive close non-household contact (n = 80, 26.32%).
Results: There were 58 (19.08%) positive rapid antibody tests. Risk factors associated with a positive rapid antibody test included WHO symptoms, namely fever/chills (odds ratio [OR] 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50 to 8.19), loss of taste or smell (OR 8.66, 95% CI 3.27 to 22.94), and the presence of a household contact (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.59 to 8.40).
Conclusions: The findings support the measures implemented to reduce the spread of infection.
 
Back
Top Bottom