• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Lab . Clinical Usefulness of the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Lab


. 2025 Dec 1;71(12).
doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2025.250327.
Clinical Usefulness of the Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection

Soyoon Hwang, Han Wook Park, Ki Tae Kwon, Eunkyung Nam, Sohyun Bae, Yoonjung Kim, Hyun-Ha Chang, Shin-Woo Kim, Nan Young Lee, Yu Kyung Kim, Won Kee Lee, Hyung Soo Han
Abstract

Background: Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a molecular diagnostic method known for its rapid processing and operational simplicity due to its isothermal amplification process. While LAMP has demonstrated comparable diagnostic accuracy to PCR in certain applications, its performance may vary depending on assay design and implementation. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the MmaxSure™ assay (MmaxSure™; Mmonitor, Daegu, South Korea) in detecting SARS-CoV-2, comparing it with the STANDARD™ M nCoV Real-Time Detection Kit (STANDARD; SD BioSensor, Suwon, South Korea) using nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab specimens.
Methods: A total of 333 specimens were included in the analysis, consisting of 113 positive and 220 negative nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples. All specimens were tested using the MmaxSure™ assay, and the results were compared to those obtained using the STANDARD™ M nCoV Real-Time Detection Kit. The diagnostic performance of the MmaxSure™ assay was evaluated in terms of positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and Cohen's kappa index for inter-assay agreement. Sensitivity, specificity, and limit of detection (LOD) for SARS-CoV-2 variants were also determined.
Results: The MmaxSure™ assay demonstrated a 100% PPA and a 100% NPA with the STANDARD™ M nCoV Real-Time Detection Kit. The Cohen's kappa index was 1.0, indicating perfect agreement between the two diagnostic methods. The MmaxSure™ assay exhibited a high sensitivity, detecting SARS-CoV-2 variants at a LOD of 2 - 4 copies/µL, without cross-reactivity with other pathogens.
Conclusions: The MmaxSure™ Fast SARS-CoV-2 Detection Kit, based on LAMP technology, exhibited a high level of diagnostic accuracy in detecting SARS-CoV-2. Its rapid turnaround time and minimal equipment requirements suggest its potential suitability for point-of-care applications. However, further prospective studies with a broader range of clinical specimens and real-world validation are needed to confirm its diagnostic utility across diverse settings.


 
Back
Top