tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis
. 2021 May 26;ciab491.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab491. Online ahead of print.
Serial intervals and case isolation delays for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sheikh Taslim Ali[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amy Yeung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Songwei Shan[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Lin Wang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Huizhi Gao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhanwei Du[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Xiao-Ke Xu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Peng Wu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Eric H Y Lau[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Benjamin J Cowling[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background: Estimates of the serial interval distribution contribute to our understanding of the transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we aimed to summarize the existing evidence on serial interval distributions and delays in case isolation for COVID-19.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the published literature and preprints in PubMed on two epidemiological parameters namely serial intervals and delay intervals relating to isolation of cases for COVID-19 until 22 October, 2020 following predefined eligibility criteria. We assessed the variation in these parameter estimates by correlation and regression analysis.
Results: Of 103 unique studies identified on serial intervals of COVID-19, 56 were included providing 129 estimates and of 451 unique studies on isolation delays, 18 studies were included providing 74 estimates. Serial interval estimates varied from 1.0 to 9.9 days, while case isolation delays varied from 1.0 to 12.5 days which were associated with spatial, methodological and temporal factors. In mainland China, the pooled mean serial interval was 6.2 (range, 5.1-7.8) days before the epidemic peak and reduced to 4.9 (range, 1.9-6.5) days after the epidemic peak. Similarly, the pooled mean isolation delay related intervals were 6.0 (range, 2.9-12.5) days and 2.4 (range, 2.0-2.7) days before and after the epidemic peak, respectively. There was a positive association between serial interval and case isolation delay.
Conclusions: Temporal factors, such as different control measures and case isolation in particular led to shorter serial interval estimates over time. Correcting transmissibility estimates for these time-varying distributions could aid mitigation efforts.
Keywords: COVID-19; Serial intervals; isolation delays; regression analysis; systematic review and meta-analysis.
. 2021 May 26;ciab491.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab491. Online ahead of print.
Serial intervals and case isolation delays for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Sheikh Taslim Ali[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Amy Yeung[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Songwei Shan[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Lin Wang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Huizhi Gao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zhanwei Du[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Xiao-Ke Xu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Peng Wu[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Eric H Y Lau[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Benjamin J Cowling[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34037748
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab491
Abstract
Background: Estimates of the serial interval distribution contribute to our understanding of the transmission dynamics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Here, we aimed to summarize the existing evidence on serial interval distributions and delays in case isolation for COVID-19.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the published literature and preprints in PubMed on two epidemiological parameters namely serial intervals and delay intervals relating to isolation of cases for COVID-19 until 22 October, 2020 following predefined eligibility criteria. We assessed the variation in these parameter estimates by correlation and regression analysis.
Results: Of 103 unique studies identified on serial intervals of COVID-19, 56 were included providing 129 estimates and of 451 unique studies on isolation delays, 18 studies were included providing 74 estimates. Serial interval estimates varied from 1.0 to 9.9 days, while case isolation delays varied from 1.0 to 12.5 days which were associated with spatial, methodological and temporal factors. In mainland China, the pooled mean serial interval was 6.2 (range, 5.1-7.8) days before the epidemic peak and reduced to 4.9 (range, 1.9-6.5) days after the epidemic peak. Similarly, the pooled mean isolation delay related intervals were 6.0 (range, 2.9-12.5) days and 2.4 (range, 2.0-2.7) days before and after the epidemic peak, respectively. There was a positive association between serial interval and case isolation delay.
Conclusions: Temporal factors, such as different control measures and case isolation in particular led to shorter serial interval estimates over time. Correcting transmissibility estimates for these time-varying distributions could aid mitigation efforts.
Keywords: COVID-19; Serial intervals; isolation delays; regression analysis; systematic review and meta-analysis.