• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . Preliminary findings from the Dynamics of the Immune Responses to Repeat Influenza Vaccination Exposures (DRIVE I) Study: a Random

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2024 Jul 23:ciae380.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae380. Online ahead of print. Preliminary findings from the Dynamics of the Immune Responses to Repeat Influenza Vaccination Exposures (DRIVE I) Study: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Benjamin J Cowling[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Sook-San Wong[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jefferson J S Santos[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lisa Touyon[SUP] 1 3 [/SUP], Jordan T Ort[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Naiqing Ye[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Natalie K M Kwok[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Faith Ho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samuel M S Cheng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dennis K M Ip[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Malik Peiris[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Richard J Webby[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Patrick C Wilson[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Sophie A Valkenburg[SUP] 3 7 [/SUP], John S Tsang[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Nancy H L Leung[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Scott E Hensley[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sarah Cobey[SUP] 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Studies have reported that repeated annual vaccination may influence influenza vaccination effectiveness in the current season.
Methods: We established a 5-year randomized placebo-controlled trial of repeated influenza vaccination (Flublok, Sanofi Pasteur) in adults 18-45 years of age. In the first two years, participants received vaccination (V) or saline placebo (P) as follows: P-P, P-V, or V-V. Serum samples were collected each year just before vaccination and after 30 and 182 days. A subset of sera collected at 5 timepoints from 95 participants were tested for antibodies against vaccine strains.
Results: From 23 October 2020 through 11 March 2021 we enrolled and randomized 447 adults. Among vaccinated individuals, antibody titers increased between days 0 and 30 against each of the vaccine strains, with smaller increases for repeat vaccinees who on average had higher pre-vaccination titers in year 2. There were statistically significant differences in the proportion of participants achieving >=four-fold rises in antibody titer for the repeat vaccinees for influenza A(H1N1), B/Victoria and B/Yamagata, but not for A(H3N2). Among participants who received vaccination in year 2, there were no statistically significant differences between the P-V and V-V groups in geometric mean titers at day 30 or the proportions of participants with antibody titers ≥40 at day 30 for any of the vaccine strains.
Conclusions: In the first two years, during which influenza did not circulate, repeat vaccinees and first-time vaccinees had similar post-vaccination geometric mean titers to all four vaccine strains, indicative of similar levels of clinical protection.

Keywords: antibody; immunogenicity; influenza; vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom