• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . Empirical antifungal treatment of critically ill patients with influenza-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A propens

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2025 Sep 15:ciaf507.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaf507. Online ahead of print. Empirical antifungal treatment of critically ill patients with influenza-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: A propensity score weighted observational study

Stefan Hatzl[SUP] 1 2 3 4 [/SUP], Lisa Kriegl[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP], Christina Geiger[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Caroline Wilhelmer[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alexander C Reisinger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Markus Keldorfer[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Julia Auinger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gernot Schilcher[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Florian Krammer[SUP] 2 3 8 9 [/SUP], Philipp Eller[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Robert Krause[SUP] 4 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Influenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) is a significant fungal complication in patients with influenza-induced acute-respiratory-distress-syndrome (ARDS). The impact of empirical antifungal treatment on IAPA incidence and outcomes remains unclear.
Methods: In this observational multicenter study (9 treatment centers), we included all consecutive patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) with influenza-associated ARDS between September 1, 2016, and March 1, 2025. We compared patients receiving empirical antifungal treatment with those who did not, focusing on 30-day IAPA incidence (primary outcome) and survival (secondary outcome). Propensity score weighting was used to account for baseline characteristic imbalances. IAPA cases were classified based on the Fungal-Infections-in-Adult-Patients-in-ICU (FUNDICU) consensus criteria.
Results: We included 172 patients, 61 (35%) of whom received empirical antifungal therapy (94% posaconazole). IAPA was diagnosed in 24 cases, with a median onset of 2 days after ICU admission. Of these, 20 occurred in the non-treatment group and 4 in the empirical treatment group. The 30-day IAPA incidence was 7.7% in the treatment group and 20.4% in the non-treatment group (p=0.002). The sub-distributional hazard ratio (sHR) for IAPA incidence in the empirical treatment group compared to the non-treatment group was 0.21 (95% CI 0.10-0.92, p=0.045). However, there was no significant difference in 30-day ICU survival.
Conclusion: In ICU patients with influenza ARDS, empirical antifungal treatment was associated with significantly reduced IAPA incidence, but this did not translate into improved survival. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of patients' specific empirical antifungal treatment with regard to IAPA incidence and outcomes.

Keywords: IAPA; ICU; influenza associated aspergillosis; mould treatment; posaconazole.

 
Back
Top