tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis
. 2026 Apr 25:ciag278.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciag278. Online ahead of print.
A Phase 1/2 Dose-Ranging Safety and Immunogenicity Study of mRNA-Based Candidate Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Adults
Catherine A Cosgrove[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrei Avanesov[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dondi Rust[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Seun Osibajo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kingston Kang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brett Leav[SUP] 2 [/SUP]; ODYSSEY Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Background: Influenza A viruses pose a persistent pandemic threat. We report safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity findings for mRNA-1018 pandemic influenza vaccine candidates from a phase 1/2 study in healthy adults.
Methods: In Part A, participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 mRNA-1018 candidates at 1 of 3 dose levels across 2 influenza A groups: (1) H5N8/H5-only or (2) H7N9/H7-only. H5N8 and H7N9 candidates were administered at 25, 50, or 100-µg and H5-only and H7-only at 12.5, 25, or 50-µg. Part B participants were randomized to receive 12.5, 25, or 50-µg H5-only-CG. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of vaccine candidates. Secondary objectives included evaluation of humoral immunogenicity through day 205 by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), neuraminidase inhibition, and microneutralization assays.
Results: Parts A and B comprised 1195 and 304 dosed participants, respectively. Overall, solicited local adverse reactions (ARs) within 7 days of vaccination occurred in 76.8% of participants across vaccine candidates and dose levels, most commonly injection-site pain. Solicited systemic ARs were reported in 62.8% of participants, most frequently fatigue and headache. Solicited ARs were predominantly grade 1-2 in severity, with few grade 3 and no grade 4 events. Post-vaccination immune responses, assessed absolutely, by HAI titers and dynamically, by seroconversion rates, tended to increase with vaccine dose. H5-based candidates induced stronger strain-specific HAI, but with comparable microneutralization titers, versus H7-based candidates.
Conclusions: Vaccine candidates were sufficiently well-tolerated and immunogenic. Further development of mRNA pandemic influenza vaccines is warranted for pandemic preparedness.
Keywords: immune response; mRNA; pandemic influenza vaccine; phase 1/2 clinical trial; safety.
. 2026 Apr 25:ciag278.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciag278. Online ahead of print.
A Phase 1/2 Dose-Ranging Safety and Immunogenicity Study of mRNA-Based Candidate Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in Healthy Adults
Catherine A Cosgrove[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Andrei Avanesov[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dondi Rust[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Seun Osibajo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kingston Kang[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brett Leav[SUP] 2 [/SUP]; ODYSSEY Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
- PMID: 42033146
- DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciag278
Background: Influenza A viruses pose a persistent pandemic threat. We report safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity findings for mRNA-1018 pandemic influenza vaccine candidates from a phase 1/2 study in healthy adults.
Methods: In Part A, participants were randomized to receive 1 of 4 mRNA-1018 candidates at 1 of 3 dose levels across 2 influenza A groups: (1) H5N8/H5-only or (2) H7N9/H7-only. H5N8 and H7N9 candidates were administered at 25, 50, or 100-µg and H5-only and H7-only at 12.5, 25, or 50-µg. Part B participants were randomized to receive 12.5, 25, or 50-µg H5-only-CG. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and reactogenicity of vaccine candidates. Secondary objectives included evaluation of humoral immunogenicity through day 205 by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), neuraminidase inhibition, and microneutralization assays.
Results: Parts A and B comprised 1195 and 304 dosed participants, respectively. Overall, solicited local adverse reactions (ARs) within 7 days of vaccination occurred in 76.8% of participants across vaccine candidates and dose levels, most commonly injection-site pain. Solicited systemic ARs were reported in 62.8% of participants, most frequently fatigue and headache. Solicited ARs were predominantly grade 1-2 in severity, with few grade 3 and no grade 4 events. Post-vaccination immune responses, assessed absolutely, by HAI titers and dynamically, by seroconversion rates, tended to increase with vaccine dose. H5-based candidates induced stronger strain-specific HAI, but with comparable microneutralization titers, versus H7-based candidates.
Conclusions: Vaccine candidates were sufficiently well-tolerated and immunogenic. Further development of mRNA pandemic influenza vaccines is warranted for pandemic preparedness.
Keywords: immune response; mRNA; pandemic influenza vaccine; phase 1/2 clinical trial; safety.