• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Clin Infect Dis . A One Health Investigation into H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Epizootics on Two Dairy Farms

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Clin Infect Dis


. 2024 Dec 10:ciae576.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae576. Online ahead of print. A One Health Investigation into H5N1 Avian Influenza Virus Epizootics on Two Dairy Farms

Ismaila Shittu[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Diego Silva[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Judith U Oguzie[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Lyudmyla V Marushchak[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gene G Olinger[SUP] 2 [/SUP], John A Lednicky[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Claudia M Trujillo-Vargas[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nicholas E Schneider[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Haiping Hao[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Gregory C Gray[SUP] 1 7 8 9 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: In early April 2024 we studied two Texas dairy farms which had suffered incursions of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) the previous month.
Methods: We employed molecular assays, cell and egg culture, Sanger and next generation sequencing to isolate and characterize viruses from multiple farm specimens (cow nasal swab, milk specimens, fecal slurry, and a dead bird).
Results: We detected H5N1 HPAIV in 64% (9/14) of milk specimens, 2.6% (1/39) of cattle nasal swab specimens, and none of 17 cattle worker nasopharyngeal swab specimens. We cultured and characterized virus from eight H5N1-positive specimens. Sanger and next-generation sequencing revealed the viruses were closely related into other recent Texas epizootic H5N1 strains of clade 2.3.4.4b. Our isolates had multiple mutations associated with increased spillover potential. Surprisingly, we detected SARS-CoV-2 in a nasal swab from a sick cow. Additionally, 14.3% (2/14) of the farm workers who donated sera were recently symptomatic and had elevated neutralizing antibodies against a related H5N1 strain.
Conclusions: While our sampling was limited, these data offer additional insight into the large H5N1 HPAIV epizootic which has rapidly spread in the United States. Due to fears that research might damage dairy businesses, studies like this one have been few. We need to find ways to work with dairy farms in collecting more comprehensive epidemiological data that are necessary for the design of future interventions against H5N1 HPAIV on cattle farms.

Keywords: avian influenza; dairy cattle farm; dairy workers; epidemiology; influenza.

 
Back
Top Bottom