• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Circulation . The Effect of Electronic Nudges on Influenza Vaccination Rate in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: a Prespecified Analysis of

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Circulation


. 2023 Mar 5.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064270. Online ahead of print.
The Effect of Electronic Nudges on Influenza Vaccination Rate in Older Adults With Cardiovascular Disease: a Prespecified Analysis of the NUDGE-FLU Trial


Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Muthiah Vaduganathan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ankeet S Bhatt[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Simin Gharib Lee[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Erica L Dueger[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sandrine I Samson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Lars Køber[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Cyril Jean-Marie Martel[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Palle Valentiner-Branth[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Tyra Grove Krause[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Influenza vaccines have been demonstrated to effectively reduce the incidence of influenza infection and potentially associated risks of cardiovascular events in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite strong guideline and public health endorsements, global influenza vaccination rates in patients with CVD are highly variable. This prespecified analysis of NUDGE-FLU (Nationwide Utilization of Danish Government Electronic Letter System for Increasing InFLUenza Vaccine Uptake) examined the effect of digital behavioral nudges on influenza vaccine uptake based on the presence of cardiovascular disease. Methods: NUDGE-FLU was a randomized, pragmatic, nationwide, register-based trial including Danish citizens aged 65 years or older during the 2022-2023 influenza season. Households were randomized in a 9:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio to usual care or 9 electronic letters with designs based on behavioral concepts. Danish nationwide registers were used to collect baseline and outcome data. The primary endpoint was receipt of an influenza vaccine on or before January 1, 2023. The effects of the intervention letters were examined according to the presence of cardiovascular disease and across cardiovascular subgroups including heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and atrial fibrillation. Results: Of 964,870 NUDGE-FLU participants from 691,820 households, 264,392 (27.4%) had CVD. During follow-up, 83.1% of participants with CVD vs 79.2% of participants without CVD received influenza vaccination (p<0.001). Compared with usual care, a letter emphasizing the potential cardiovascular benefits of influenza vaccination increased vaccination rates; this effect was consistent in participants with CVD (absolute difference +0.60 percentage points, 99.55% CI -0.48 to 1.68) and without CVD (+0.98 percentage points, 99.55% CI 0.27 to 1.70; P for interaction=0.41). A repeated letter strategy with a reminder follow-up letter 14 days later was also effective in increasing influenza vaccination, irrespective of CVD (CVD: absolute difference +0.80 percentage points, 99.55% CI -0.27 to 1.86; no CVD: +0.67 percentage points, 99.55% CI -0.06 to 1.40; P for interaction=0.77). Effectiveness of both nudging strategies was consistent across all major CVD subgroups. None of the other seven nudging strategies were effective, regardless of CVD status. Conclusions: Electronic letter interventions emphasizing the potential cardiovascular benefits of influenza vaccination and using a reminder letter strategy were similarly beneficial in increasing influenza vaccination rates among older adults with and without CVD and across cardiovascular subgroups. Electronic nudges may improve influenza vaccine uptake in individuals with CVD.
 
Back
Top Bottom