• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Circulation . High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: The FLUNITY-HD Prespecified Pooled Analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Circulation


. 2025 Nov 10.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.077801. Online ahead of print. High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: The FLUNITY-HD Prespecified Pooled Analysis

Niklas Dyrby Johansen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Daniel Modin[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jacobo Pardo-Seco[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Carmen Rodriguez-Tenreiro-Sánchez[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Matthew M Loiacono[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Rebecca C Harris[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Marine Dufournet[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Robertus van Aalst[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Ayman Chit[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Carsten Schade Larsen[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Lykke Larsen[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Lothar Wiese[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Michael Dalager-Pedersen[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Brian L Claggett[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Kira Hyldekær Janstrup[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Carmen Duran-Parrondo[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Marta Piñeiro-Sotelo[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Martín Cribeiro-González[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Mónica Conde-Pájaro[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Susana Mirás-Carballal[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Juan-Manuel González-Pérez[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Scott D Solomon[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Pradeesh Sivapalan[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Cyril Jean-Marie Martel[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Jens Ulrik Stæhr Jensen[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Federico Martinón-Torres[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Tor Biering-Sørensen[SUP] 19 [/SUP]; DANFLU-2 Study Group and the GALFLU Trial Team



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) has demonstrated superior protection against a range of hospitalization endpoints versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV), but its effectiveness against specific cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and in those with pre-existing CV disease (CVD) is not well elucidated.
Methods: In a prespecified secondary analysis of the FLUNITY-HD individual-level pooled dataset integrating two methodologically harmonized pragmatic, individually randomized trials conducted in Denmark and Spain, we investigated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV against severe CV outcomes and according to pre-existing CVD among adults aged ≥65 years. Data were primarily obtained from routine healthcare databases, with follow-up from 14 days post-vaccination to May 31 the following year.
Results: The pooled dataset encompassed 466,320 individually randomized participants, of whom 107,700 (23.1%) had a history of CVD. HD-IIV reduced the incidence of hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia, cardio-respiratory disease, laboratory-confirmed influenza, and any cause compared with SD-IIV, irrespective of the presence or absence of pre-existing CVD (p[SUB]interaction[/SUB]> 0.66 for all outcomes). Compared with the SD-IIV group, the HD-IIV group had a significantly lower incidence of hospitalization for any CVD (HD-IIV, 1.15% vs. SD-IIV, 1.24%; rVE, 6.6%; 95% CI, 1.6 to 11.4; P=0.010), hospitalization for any respiratory disease (HD-IIV, 0.92% vs. SD-IIV, 0.98%; rVE, 6.5%; 95% CI, 0.7 to 11.9; P=0.027), and hospitalization for heart failure (HD-IIV, 0.11% vs. SD-IIV, 0.15%; rVE, 21.3%; 95% CI, 7.6 to 33.0; P=0.003).
Conclusions: In a prespecified pooled analysis of 466,320 individually randomized older adults, HD-IIV reduced the incidence of a wide range of severe CV and respiratory outcomes compared with SD-IIV, with consistent findings regardless of prior history of CVD. Among CV outcomes, the protective effect of HD-IIV vs. SD-IIV was particularly pronounced against hospitalization for heart failure.


 
Back
Top Bottom