• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Circ J . Therapeutic-Dose vs. Prophylactic-Dose Anticoagulation Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in a Practice-Based Observational

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Circ J


. 2022 Jun 3.
doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-22-0209. Online ahead of print.
Therapeutic-Dose vs. Prophylactic-Dose Anticoagulation Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in a Practice-Based Observational Study


Yugo Yamashita[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sen Yachi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Makoto Takeyama[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yuji Nishimoto[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ichizo Tsujino[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Junichi Nakamura[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Naoto Yamamoto[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hiroko Nakata[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Satoshi Ikeda[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Michihisa Umetsu[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Shizu Aikawa[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Hiroya Hayashi[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Hirono Satokawa[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Yoshinori Okuno[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eriko Iwata[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Yoshito Ogihara[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Nobutaka Ikeda[SUP] 14 [/SUP], Akane Kondo[SUP] 15 [/SUP], Takehisa Iwai[SUP] 16 [/SUP], Norikazu Yamada[SUP] 17 [/SUP], Tomohiro Ogawa[SUP] 18 [/SUP], Takao Kobayashi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Makoto Mo[SUP] 19 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: The potential benefit of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation for critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is still controversial.Methods and Results: In the CLOT-COVID study, 225 patients with severe COVID-19 on admission requiring mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were divided into patients with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation (N=110) and those with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation (N=115). There was no significant difference in the incidence of thrombosis between the groups (9.1% vs. 7.8%, P=0.73).
Conclusions: Among a cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19, approximately half received therapeutic-dose anticoagulation, although it did not show a potential benefit compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation.

Keywords: Anticoagulation; COVID-19; Critical illness; Severe illness; Thrombosis.
 
Back
Top Bottom