• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP- Vitamin D doesn't prevent COVID-19, other respiratory infections, studies find

Lance

MPH, CSP & CIT Retired, CHMM Emeritus
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-per...-19-other-respiratory-infections-studies-find

Vitamin D doesn't prevent COVID-19, other respiratory infections, studies find


Filed Under:
COVID-19
Mary Van Beusekom | News Writer | CIDRAP News

Sep 08, 2022

Findings from two large clinical trials published yesterday in BMJ discount the notion that vitamin D supplements protect against COVID-19 or other respiratory-tract infections, although both had notable limitations.

No differences in vitamin, placebo results


In a phase 3 randomized, controlled trial in the United Kingdom, a team led by University of London researchers enrolled 6,200 participants aged 16 years and older, tested the vitamin D levels of 3,100, and gave a 6-month supply of two different doses of oral supplements to 2,674 with suboptimal concentrations (less than 75 nanograms per deciliter [ng/dL]). The control group consisted of 2,949 participants not offered vitamin D.

Median participant age was 60.2 years, 67.0% were female, and 1.2% had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine at enrollment, a figure that rose to 89.1% by study end. Supplement recipients knew they were taking an active drug, and nearly half of controls reported taking a vitamin D supplement at least once during the study.

Participants, who reported taking no vitamin D supplements at enrollment, were given either 800 or 3,200 international units [IU]/day for 6 months. Follow-up ran from Dec 17, 2020, to Jun 16, 2021, a period of high COVID-19 prevalence and low COVID-19 vaccine coverage in the United Kingdom. During the 6-month follow-up, participants received monthly online questionnaires about any respiratory-tract or COVID-19 infections and symptoms.

A total of 299 participants tested positive for an all-cause respiratory infection. Relative to controls, at least one acute respiratory infection was diagnosed in 5.7% of the lower-dose group (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.66) and in 5.0% of the higher-dose group (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.46).

Compared with the 78 of 2,949 infected controls (2.6%), 55/1,515 (3.6%) in the lower-dose group tested positive for COVID-19 (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.97), as did 45/1,515 (3.0%) in the higher-dose group (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.63).

A subset of participants underwent vitamin D testing at the end of the study. Relative to controls, vitamin D levels were, on average, 12.7 ng/dL higher in the lower-dose group and 36.3 ng/dL higher in higher-dose recipients. A subgroup analysis found no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination changed the effect of allocation or COVID-19 incidence.

Four control patients died, as did two in the higher-dose vitamin D group and one in the lower-dose group. Also, 143 of the higher-dose and 85 of the lower-dose group had at least one serious adverse event, but none were considered related to the vitamin.

"Among people aged 16 years and older with a high baseline prevalence of suboptimal vitamin D status, implementation of a population level test-and-treat approach to vitamin D supplementation was not associated with a reduction in risk of all cause acute respiratory tract infection or COVID-19," the authors wrote.

The researchers noted that low-cost vitamin D was a target of interest because, while vaccination is the foundation of COVID-19 mitigation, its global effectiveness has been limited by cost, availability, and vaccine hesitancy, failure, and escape. "Vitamin D metabolites have long been recognised to support innate immune responses to respiratory viruses and bacteria, and regulate immunopathological inflammation," they wrote.

Infection, serious illness not reduced


In Norway, a team led by Oslo University researchers studied whether low-dose vitamin D supplementation in the form of cod liver oil in winter would prevent COVID-19 infection, serious illness, or other respiratory infections in adults not already taking the vitamin.

The quadruple-blinded, randomized, controlled trial involved 34,601 participants aged 18 to 75 years who received either 5 milliliters (mL) of cod liver oil (10 micrograms of vitamin D) a day (17,278 participants) or 5 mL of corn oil (placebo) (17,323) for up to 6 months from Nov 10, 2020, to Jun 2, 2021.

Average participant age was relatively young (44.9 years), 64.5% were women, average body mass index was 26.1 kilograms per meter squared (overweight), and 35.6% received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccine during the study. A strong majority of participants (86%) had adequate vitamin D levels at baseline.

Participants completed questionnaires on COVID-19 and other respiratory infections, COVID-19 vaccination, and adverse events at baseline and then monthly for 6 months. Some participants (342) submitted dried-blood samples for vitamin D testing before and during the study, and 1,333 gave whole-blood samples for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing at baseline.

Cod liver oil was not tied to a reduced risk of COVID-19 infection, serious illness, or other respiratory infection. Over a median of 164 days, 227 supplement recipients (1.31%) tested positive for COVID-19, compared with 228 (1.32%) in the control group (relative risk [RR], 1.00; adjusted 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.22).

A total of 121 supplement recipients (0.70%) and 101 controls (0.58%) had serious COVID-19 (RR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.65), and 3,964 (22.9%) supplement recipients and 3,834 (22.1%) controls reported at least one acute respiratory infection (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.11). Of all participants, 2.1% had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, indicating active or previous infection, at baseline.

Supplement recipients who submitted two blood samples for vitamin D testing showed only marginal increases in vitamin levels during the study. Seventeen participants (8 in the supplement group, 9 controls) were admitted to a hospital, and 4 in each group needed intensive care, but none died. No serious adverse events were reported in either group.

"Supplementation with cod liver oil, a low dose vitamin D supplement, was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, serious COVID-19, or other acute respiratory infections compared with placebo," the authors concluded.

Vaccine rollout potential confounder


In a related editorial, Peter Bergman, PhD, of the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden, said that the findings of both trials could have been skewed by the concurrent "highly successful" COVID-19 vaccine rollout in the United Kingdom and Norway.

He also said that vaccination is the gold-standard prophylaxis for COVID-19 and that vitamin D and cod liver oil should not be offered to healthy people with adequate vitamin D levels. There may, however, still be a role for vitamin D in COVID-19, pending further research, he added.

"A pragmatic approach for the clinician could be to focus on risk groups; those who could be tested before supplementation, including people with dark skin, or skin that is rarely exposed to the sun; pregnant women; and elderly people with chronic diseases," he wrote. "For those with inadequate vitamin D levels (<50 nmol/L [ng/dL]), supplementation with 1000-2000 IU/day could be a safe, simple, and affordable way to restore vitamin D levels, improve bone health, and take advantage of any possible protective effect against respiratory tract infections."
 
Back
Top Bottom