• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CIDRAP- Study: Few veterans used COVID-19 antivirals, antibodies

Lance

MPH, CSP & CIT Retired, CHMM Emeritus
https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-per...-veterans-used-covid-19-antivirals-antibodies

Study: Few veterans used COVID-19 antivirals, antibodies


Filed Under:
COVID-19
Stephanie Soucheray | News Reporter | CIDRAP News

Nov 14, 2022

In January and February of 2022—when the Omicron surge caused a high number of COVID-19 infections in the United States—veterans with mild to moderate infections seen in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system as outpatients underused pharmacotherapies, including monoclonal antibodies and antivirals. Researchers reported their findings in JAMA Network Open.

At the time of the Omicron surge, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved for emergency use nirmatrelvir boosted with ritonavir (Paxlovid) and molnupiravir in late of December 2021 and remdesivir for outpatient use in January 2022. The drugs were aimed at preventing mild and moderate COVID-19 from progressing into more severe disease.

A good setting for gauging treatment use


The frequency of use of these therapies has not been well-described, so the authors of the study used the Veterans Affairs health care system (VA) to examine if and when the therapies were used among COVID-19 positive patients ages 18 and older seen in VA hospitals between Jan 1 and Feb 8, 2022.

Among, 111,717 VA enrollees included in the study, the median age was 60 years, and 96,482 (86.4%) were male. Twenty percent were Black, 9.6% Hispanic, and 68.0% were White.

All of those patients were eligible for pharmacotherapy according to the FDA authorization, but only 4,233 (3.8%) received any pharmacotherapy within the VA or through VA Community Care.

"This included 994 (0.9%) persons who received sotrovimab, 1,710 (1.5%) who received nirmatrelvir, 921 (0.8%) who received molnupiravir, 608 (0.5%) who received remdesivir, and 107,484 (96.2%) who were not treated with anti–SARS-CoV-2 pharmacotherapies within the VA or through VA Community Care," the authors said.

Older, white patients more likely to get treatment


A number of factors were associated with an increased likelihood of using one of the four therapies for mild to moderate infections, including older age, with those aged 65 to 74 years vs 50 to 64 years with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.66 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 1.80]—or a 66% higher odds—and those aged at least 75 years vs 50 to 64 years with an aOR of 1.67 (95% CI, 1.53to 1.84), representing a 67% higher uptake. Veterans living in rural areas were also more likely to get treatment compared to urban patients (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.28).

Having a higher number of underlying conditions (at least 5 conditions vs 1 to 2 conditions: aOR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.98 to 2.39) increased treatments, as did being White.

"Compared with White veterans, Black veterans (aOR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.60-0.72]) were less likely to receive treatment; and compared with non-Hispanic veterans, Hispanic veterans (aOR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.77-0.99]) were less likely to receive treatment," the authors said.

The study authors did note that prescriptions for these four treatments did increase as the study period went on, with the proportion of veterans who were treated doubling from 3.1% in January to 7.1% in February.

"These findings suggest the need for improved infrastructure and education to support treatment of persons at risk for progression to severe COVID-19," the authors concluded. "Studies of the effectiveness and comparative effectiveness of outpatient COVID-19 pharmacotherapies will also be critical to inform clinical care."
 
Back
Top Bottom